Social Engineering Blogs

An Aggregator for Blogs About Social Engineering and Related Fields

The Social Influence Consulting Group Blog December 8, 2013

The Art of Exclusivity

Source Credit: This week Drive.com.au ran an article written by Sam Hall titled “Latest Prancing Horse brings prodigious performance and added exclusivity”.  While not reproducing the entire article here I have used some of Hall’s text and value added to it from a Science of Influence perspective to look at Ferrari;s Art of Exclusivity.

Exclusivity laferrari

Ferrari are already an exclusive luxury brand due to the price they are able to command for their prancing horse but they have decided to use Scarcity and take exclusivity to a whole new level.

Ferrari have announced that from now on they are only producing 7000 vehicles a year.   Ferrari Australasia president Herbert Appleroth said, “It does mean that customers will have to wait a little bit longer and that some customers may miss out.”

“The idea is that when some customers go to sell these collectable cars… they’ll get a fantastic return. Ferrari is one of the two best returns in asset class in the world – number one is Ferrari and number two is Chinese art.

“In the past five years, Ferrari has outperformed anything else. Over time, modern Ferraris become classics, so you would expect solid value from this car in the future.”

But Ferrari have not stopped there.  The newly released 458 Speciale showcar was whisked into Australia for barely 48 hours to star at this week’s unveiling, en route to similar launches in Indonesia and Singapore.  Ferrari has already received over 120 orders for the prodigious Speciale when it lands in Australia mid-2014, but Appleroth admitted less than half of prospective buyers will be successful in their applications.

“That’s the art of exclusivity,” he said. “The priority is based on first come-first served, and people have known this car was coming for a few years, so sales are always based on those who expressed interest at the start.”

So now Ferrari are using Scarcity to protect the value of their cars by making less off them available and if you want one you need to get on the waiting list early if you want to be rewarded.  But neither of these strategies compares to Ferrari’s $1.7 million LaFerrari (English translation is simply “The Ferrari”).

To be eligible for one of only 499 editions worldwide, prospective buyers must already own at least five Ferraris and agree to sell it back to the factory once they have had enough of the LaFerrari.

An article published this week in Fairfax Media stated that well-known car collectors like transport tycoon Lindsay Fox have had their applications denied for the most expensive car to ever wear the prancing horse badge.

“There are multiple cars coming into Australia and New Zealand .. but we’re not at liberty to be able to talk about who was successful and who wasn’t,” Appleroth said.

“We had 20 interested parties – known collectors and collectors who were not known – and unfortunately some people missed out.”

The crazy thing is the LaFerrari cannot be registered in Australia because it is only being manufactured as a left-hand drive vehicle.  So the lucky collectors will have one of the most exclusive cars in the world yet they will not be able to drive it on the open road.

Implication for You

How can you do something to highlight the exclusivity of your product or service?  You will know you are on the right track when your idea scares you!

Value what you have and keep the value high by only making a limited number available.

 

Thanks to Jamie O for sharing the drive article with me!

 

 

 

The post The Art of Exclusivity appeared first on Social Influence Consulting Group.

Filed Under: Influence, LaFerrari, Scarcity

The Humintell Blog December 7, 2013

Cooperation and Competition in Intercultural Interactions

Are team players more cooperative when they can relate to their teammates?

New research conducted by Drs. David Matsumoto and Hyi Sung Hwang now relates the behavioral ability to cooperatively interact with people to cultural differences between the players.

In this study, US born Americans played a modified Prisoner’s Dilemma game in same sex dyads in one of three conditions: with another American (Control), with an international student (Intercultural Condition), or with another American but under stressful conditions (Stress Condition).

Drs. Matsumoto and Hwang hypothesized that the Intercultural Condition would produce less cooperation and less positive behavioral outcomes than the Control Condition and that these behavioral differences would be linked to cultural differences in the dyad.

As predicted the Intercultural Condition produced less cooperation and more competition than the Control Condition and those behavioral differences were linked to cultural differences in the dyad.

Dr. Hyi Sung Hwang stated that, “The study showed that intercultural dyads (subjects from different countries; Americans vs. non-Americans) tended to be less cooperative and more competitive than the dyads of subjects from same countries (i.e., all Americans) when playing Prisoner’s Dilemma. This study was the first to link such behavioral outcomes with actual cultural differences between the interactants. This finding is significant because it shows how difficult intercultural interactions can be without even one’s awareness of it.”

The studies’ findings show that intercultural interactions are difficult and potentially costly, especially among strangers, which is important for many to recognize.

Identifying the specific source of the differences can help practitioners to target those variables in order to avoid unnecessary conflict and to facilitate cooperation and harmony in intercultural interactions.  This should be true in health-care interactions, negotiations, and business settings alike.

To improve your cultural interaction skill-set try Humintell’s IntelliCulture and package deals.

Filed Under: Cross Culture, Science

The Humintell Blog December 3, 2013

Our Gestures Often Betray Us

The article above in Spanish was recently published in A Tu Salud Magazine. A rough English translation of the article is below:

Our gestures often betray us: As much as we try to disguise our intentions or feelings, we project microexpressions: involuntary movements of our face that reveal what we hold deep and try to hide at all costs .

Fractions of a second beyond the human eye, but easily caught by cameras because technology is now able to detect those tiny and quick facial expressions that reveal pursed lips , wide eyes that reflect fear or scrunching  of the nose  showing disgust.

Thus, some experts have created programs that analyze the 44 facial muscles and are great tools in detecting lies. This software, is so helpful that agents of American law have been involved. “There are programs that are being promoted as useful to capture criminals by reading their faces. [However,] only reading this part of the body can not exhaustively determine who is a criminal, whether or not they committed a crime or are thinking about committing a crime,“ explains Joe Navarro, a former FBI counterintelligence agent specialized in the area of nonverbal communication . “These programs are created to detect stress in the face or concealed emotions, [however] these emotional leaks are not themselves indicators of deception , because there is no single behavior that indicates [that],“ Navarro added .

Meanwhile, Mark Frank, a researcher at the University of Buffalo (USA ), which has worked on the facial expressions of people in pressure situations also notes that “this type of work and the results have influenced the training of law enforcement .“

More than just a behavioral screening tool, they [the experts trained in microexpressions] can determine what to delve into deeper to find out the truth. Therefore it is useful to law enforcement because “It helps them decide which questions are to be asked to get more facts and which can then be compared with other evidence .“

For David Matsumoto , a professor of psychology at San Francisco University of California (USA ) , “the use of nonverbal behavior as a tool to penetrate the personality, motivation and intentions of individuals, especially those with hostile intent or who are lying, can be very useful in all cultures.“ In fact, in his research in nonverbal behavior especially microexpressions has aided the U.S. Department of Defense.

Several programs, such as METT , SETT (developed by the pioneering psychologist in the study of emotions and their relationships with the facial expressions , Paul Ekman ) and MiX Elite/SubX Elite (David Matsumoto ) serve as training for signs of facial expressions of emotion [that flash on and off the face very quickly and are expressed in his stakes situations].

Individuals download a  program , showing faces  that do not reflect any expression [neutral] and suddenly a snapshot of a particular  gesture is displayed for a fraction of a second and the individual must identify emotion was displayed. In the case of METT , if the character is angry, for example, it is reflected across his face (very quickly).  The SETT and SubX trainings, are even more complex , they only show the partial expression (i.e. just the eyes, or just

Frank adds that “programs are not catching criminals themselves, but help to better read the signs of subtle emotions on others to better understand and interact well with them and get to the truth.“

WHAT IS YET TO IMPROVE

Navarro, a former FBI agent, however is more skeptical, “this software ignores the rest of the body. It noted that these programs only consider the face, and there , as Navarro points out in his latest work, ” Clues To Deceit ” there are over 200 signals that help us in detecting stress, and most of them are not micro expressions, and they are observed in other parts of the body as well.“

Even Paul Ekman , who coined the term microexpression, affirms in his books that they [microexpressions] are a single behavior that is indicative of deception, but are signs of distress especially hidden emotions.

Matsumoto agrees that “I believe that the behavior does not verbal is one of the best tools. I do not think I have a unique opportunity to catch criminals, but rather a combination of techniques and tests that greatly enhance the research.“

For the former FBI agent, Navarro, the best way to identify and intercept criminals remains the classic “physical observation by a trained professional . Look for signs such as excessive sweating , agitation , facial expressions,  heavy smoking , dress , etc.“

Filed Under: Uncategorized

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 362
  • 363
  • 364
  • 365
  • 366
  • …
  • 561
  • Next Page »

About

Welcome to an aggregator for blogs about social engineering and related fields. Feel free to take a look around, and make sure to visit the original sites.

If you would like to suggest a site or contact us, use the links below.

Contact

  • Contact
  • Suggest a Site
  • Remove a Site

© Copyright 2025 Social Engineering Blogs · All Rights Reserved ·