Social Engineering Blogs

An Aggregator for Blogs About Social Engineering and Related Fields

The Humintell Blog January 3, 2021

The Universality of Facial Expressions of Emotion

The Face is Special

Those of you who have been following us (thank you!) know that faces do many things, and one very special thing that faces do is express emotion. 

Over half a century of scientific research has documented that seven facial expressions of emotion are universally expressed and recognized, all around the world, regardless of race, culture, nationality, religion, gender or any other demographic variable. 

They are: Anger, Contempt, Fear, Disgust, Happiness, Sadness, Surprise

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read our previous blog for cues on how to identify the seven universal basic emotions listed above.


Basic Emotions

These findings led to decades of research that led to the identification of what are known as basic emotions. 

Basic emotions are a class of emotion for which there is abundant research evidence for certain characteristics, including 

  1. Universal, underlying psychological triggers or antecedents
  2. Unique physiological signatures
  3. Pan-cultural cognitive gating
  4. Cross-cultural feelings and experiences
  5. Universal nonverbal expressions in the face, voice and body. 

Of course, basic emotions are not the only kind of emotions humans have; we have many other, very different types of emotions. But basic emotions are a special type of emotion because research has demonstrated that they have those unique characteristics above that others do not (or more precisely, research has yet to find them in other emotions).  

Our view of basic emotions is based on universal, observable nonverbal behavior in facial expressions. But our view is not the only way to characterize basic emotions. Scholars have differed in what they call “basic emotions.” We believe that different characterizations of the emotion system in humans do not necessarily argue against each other (although scholars and researchers love to argue with each other); rather they are different ways of understanding the very complex emotion system. For discussion about other ways to classify basic emotions, read this past blog.


The Universality of Facial Expressions of Emotion

Some scholars have argued against the idea of basic emotions and the universality of facial expressions of emotion. We have reviewed very closely all of those claims (that recycle themselves every couple of decades) and the evidence cited in support of them. As we have mentioned before, we are very happy to have a scientific, technical discussion about that evidence with anyone. 

We stand by our conviction that facial expressions of emotion are universal and biologically innate, and that the link between a spontaneous, intense, and meaningful emotional reaction and a corresponding facial expression has never been refuted by any study. For more info on why we think so, read this past blog on the topic.


Emotions and Nonverbal Behavior

 

Research of the last two decades have furthered our understanding of emotions and nonverbal behavior. 

Much of this research has linked facial expressions with other nonverbal channels – gaze, head, and whole body movements – to express emotions across cultures, such as shame and embarrassment, love, gratitude, sympathy, pride, and triumph.

Read more about our research on triumph here.

 


The Latest Research

The latest research findings continue to expand our knowledge about emotion, nonverbal behavior, and facial expressions. A recent study published in Nature Research reported that 16 facial expressions occur in similar contexts worldwide (amusement, anger, awe, concentration, confusion, contempt, contentment, desire, disappointment, doubt, elation, interest, pain, sadness, surprise, triumph). 

To be sure, not all of these are emotions (e.g., concentration, confusion; but that depends on one’s definition of emotion), and those that are emotions are likely variants of the original seven universal facial expressions of emotion. Interestingly, there were no cultural differences in the facial configurations of these expressions, but there were cultural differences in how strongly they were expressed.  

Thus, today we can still safely conclude that there are at least seven emotion families that are primarily expressed in the face that are universally expressed and recognized. These emotions and expressions likely serve as the basis by which variants occur, and these variants may likely be universal as well. Additionally, there are other types of facial expressions that are likely universal, not of emotion but of cognition or cognitive processes. And facial expressions combine with other bodily movements to convey other emotions.  

All this research is leading to more nuanced understandings of emotions and nonverbal behavior. Although we know that emotions, when elicited, recruit coordinated, whole-body responses, there are likely different parts of the body that are more salient for some emotions with regard to expressive behavior observable by others. We believe that different nonverbal channels were recruited to convey specific emotions based on their function within our evolutionary history. For example, conveying fear with our faces and bodies was more adaptive for humans in the past because people could observe fear reactions from farther away than just by seeing faces alone. Recognizing emotions such as surprise or disgust from a distance was not as important, so these were more easily conveyed more solely by faces. This is one reason why accuracy rates in multiple studies of judging fear solely through facial expressions are generally lower than rates for other emotions.  


What Else Our Faces Do

many-expressions-facial-expressionsFinally, let’s not forget that expressing emotion is just one thing that faces do. We also know that facial behavior has many other functions such as:  

  • Signaling cognition and cognitive processes (which the research described above demonstrated) 
  • Signaling specific verbal words or phrases 
  • Articulating speech 
  • Signaling physical exertion or physical effort 
  • Other idiosyncratic things 

See our blog here for more discussion. All in all the research to date continues to demonstrate the power of faces all around the world.  

 


Stay tuned here and subscribe to the right —-> to keep up with more about the latest research on faces, emotion, and nonverbal behavior!

 

The post The Universality of Facial Expressions of Emotion first appeared on Humintell.

Filed Under: Emotion, Science

The Humintell Blog July 23, 2020

How Smartphone Data Can Predict Your Personality

For many people around the globe, smartphones are an integral and indispensable part of their daily lives. Rarely more than an arm’s length away, these sensor-rich devices are easily used to collect rich and extensive records of their users’ behaviors which some argue poses serious threats to individual privacy.

But what can smartphone data tell us about the user’s personality?

Computational social scientists and psychologists at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet in Munich (LMU) utilize smartphone data in order to learn more about personality traits and social behavior.

According to Science Direct, in a study that appears in the journal PNAS, a team of researchers led by LMU psychologist Markus Bühner set out to determine whether conventional data passively collected by smartphones (such as times or frequencies of use) provide insights into users’ personalities. The answer was clear cut.

“Yes, automated analysis of these data does allow us to draw conclusions about the personalities of users, at least for most of the major dimensions of personality,” says Clemens Stachl, who used to work with Bühner

The LMU team recruited 624 volunteers for their PhoneStudy project. The participants agreed to fill out an extensive questionnaire describing their personality traits, and to install an app that had been developed specially for the study on their phones for 30 days. The app was designed to collect coded information relating to the behavior of the user.

According to their press release, “The researchers were primarily interested in data pertaining to communication patterns, social behavior and mobility, together with users’ choice and consumption of music, the selection of apps used, and the temporal distribution of their phone usage over the course of the day. All the data on personality and smartphone use were then analyzed with the aid of machine-learning algorithms, which were trained to recognize and extract patterns from the behavioral data, and relate these patterns to the information obtained from the personality surveys.

Focus was given to the five most significant personality dimensions (the Big Five) identified by psychologists, which enable them to characterize personality differences between individuals in a comprehensive way:

  • Openness: willingness to adopt new ideas, experiences and values
  • Conscientiousness: dependability, punctuality, ambitiousness and discipline
  • Extraversion: sociability, assertiveness, adventurousness, dynamism and friendliness
  • Agreeableness: willingness to trust others, good natured, outgoing, obliging, helpful
  • Neuroticism (Emotional stability): self-confidence, equanimity, positivity, self-control

The automated analysis revealed that the algorithm was indeed able to successfully derive most of these personality traits from combinations of the multifarious elements of their smartphone usage.

Moreover, the results provide hints as to which types of digital behavior are most informative for specific self-assessments of personality. For example, data pertaining to communication patterns and social behavior (as reflected by smartphone use) correlated strongly with levels of self-reported extraversion, while information relating to patterns of day and night-time activity was significantly predictive of self-reported degrees of conscientiousness.

The results of the study are of great value to researchers, as studies have so far been almost exclusively based on self-assessments. The conventional method has proven to be sufficiently reliable in predicting levels of professional success, for instance.

“Nevertheless, we still know very little about how people actually behave in their everyday lives — apart from what they choose to tell us on our questionnaires,” says Markus Bühner. “

Thanks to their broad distribution, their intensive use and their very high level of performance, smartphones are an ideal tool with which to probe the relationships between self-reported and real patterns of behavior.”

Want to learn more about this hugely complex but entirely fascinating topic?
Don’t miss a rare opportunity to learn from Dr. David Matsumoto in a first-time series, powered by Humintell science!
Learn more here!

Filed Under: Science

The Humintell Blog May 11, 2020

Addressing Arguments Against Facial Expressions of Emotion

Within the past few months, many people have reached out to Humintell and asked us to comment on recent research articles that argue against facial expressions of emotion. After a lot of deliberation, Director Dr. David Matsumoto addresses those issues in the video above. 

First and foremost, I’d like to express my deep and sincere respect for all the researchers on both sides of this issue. I encourage healthy debates and more importantly, data about those debates. I think those debates are very healthy for science as well as for scientists, practitioners but most importantly, for the general public.

Dr. Matsumoto has researched and read the vast majority of all the studies that have been cited as evidence for and against the various positions that exist. In the video above, he does not get into technical issues of claims or the nature of the studies or exact data. Though he is happy to get into those discussions, they would require some knowledge of methodology. More importantly, he thinks the message that he wants to impart gets lost really easily if that path is gone down.


Dr. Matsumoto agrees with all the data he has seen from all the researchers. What he doesn’t agree with are all the interpretations or claims made about that data.

I believe data and findings are generated within the limitations of the methodologies that are used to produce that data.

If you look at the papers that argue against facial expressions of emotion, they typically don’t encompass all of the evidence for facial expressions of emotion or their universality including:

  • 100s of Judgement studies
  • Production studies
  • Studies of blind individuals
  • Studies of children and infants around the world
  • Studies of kin vs non-kin
  • Studies of family vs non-family members
  • Non-human primate studies

These types of debates have been occurring for a century. Ever since Darwin started this work and published it in 1872, these ideas have been debated hotly both in the lay public and academic discourse. Within the academic discourse, the start of these debates came from early anthropologists like Margaret Mead and Ray Birdwhistell. Those debates carried on to the 50s, 60s, and 70s. The original universality studies were conducted in the 60s and 70s. And even from the 80s these same debates and arguments have been occurring. 

To tell you the truth, the nature of the arguments made are essentially the same today as they were 30 or 40 years ago when I started being involved with them directly myself. 

A lot of the thinking that’s dominated this field and much of academia is what Dr. Matsumoto calls “logical determinism”. Logical determinism is a way of thinking that things are mutually exclusive; they’re either or, it’s this way or that way. They are either or dichotomies. Dr. Matsumoto thinks this is true for a lot of academic debates as well as much every day thinking.


What are the limitations of logical determinism?

  • Leads easily to confirmation bias. This confirmation bias exists in the way academics think about their phenomenon. It also biases the way they create studies and the way they, Dr. Matsumoto included, interpret data. 
  • Leads to what might call straw person arguments. One straw person argument heard all the time is “facial expressions of emotion are the only things that faces do” or that “they’re always reflective of an emotional state”. 

The thought that facial expressions are always reliable indicators of emotion is a straw person argument because no one who studies facial expressions of emotion today seriously believes that. 

There’s actually a recent survey of all of the most contemporary emotion researchers in the field that was published in 2016. A survey went out to about 250 of those researchers around the world and 88% of them believed there was compelling evidence for universals in any aspect of emotion. The vast majority of researchers in this field believe the existence of facial expressions of emotion but they don’t believe these extreme straw person arguments and no one does.


Faces do many, many things.

One very special thing that faces do is create facial expressions of emotion. We know that our faces can create thousands of behaviors.

We also know that our facial behavior has many other different functions such as:

  • Signal cognition and cognitive processes
  • Signal specific verbal words or phrases
  • Speech articulation
  • Signals of physical exertion or physical effort
  • Idiosyncratic things

Because of these multiple functions of facial expressions, it makes perfect sense that some experiments will find (under some conditions), that facial behaviors are not necessarily a signal of an emotion. There’s no question about that.

But what is also true is that when a true and strong emotional reaction is spontaneously triggered, and the closer that reaction is to something that is really meaningful in our lives, that will produce the impulse to create a facial expression of emotion in people all around the world.

The link between a spontaneous, strong, intense, meaningful emotional reaction and a corresponding facial expression has never been refuted by any study.

There have been many other studies about other aspects of the face, especially studies where people are judging faces. But no study that has actually elicited a meaningful, intense, emotional reaction *spontaneously* has shown otherwise. In addition, there are a lot of studies that have shown that the face does many, many other things sometimes with the same muscles we use for emotion signaling. 

It is necessary to understand the entirety of the data in terms of the complexity of the face.


What is it about the question of universality or not that gets people so heated?

Perhaps the question about universality is somehow related to how we see ourselves and humankind; whether we see humans as fundamentally similar or somehow different. It is a deep, philosophical question with no clear answers.

Although he doesn’t agree with all the interpretations that are made of the data, Dr. Matsumoto believes that we can find ways to understand the totality of the data without negating one side or the other. 

To learn more about the seven basic emotions, visit this past blog

Filed Under: Emotion, Nonverbal Behavior, Science

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • …
  • 131
  • Next Page »

About

Welcome to an aggregator for blogs about social engineering and related fields. Feel free to take a look around, and make sure to visit the original sites.

If you would like to suggest a site or contact us, use the links below.

Contact

  • Contact
  • Suggest a Site
  • Remove a Site

© Copyright 2026 Social Engineering Blogs · All Rights Reserved ·