Social Engineering Blogs

An Aggregator for Blogs About Social Engineering and Related Fields

psychmechanicsblog February 9, 2017

Why do some men rape? Understanding the psychology of rapists

In humans, females have greater reproductive certainty than males. This means that while most females will eventually reproduce, a lot of men are can be entirely excluded from reproducing.


Also, since human females can produce a limited number of eggs and invest much more in their offspring than males, they’re a reproductively valuable resource.


The result is that there’s usually fierce intrasexual competition among men for women and men are predisposed to be aggressive, eager to mate, and less discriminating in choosing mates. (see Why men have a stronger sex drive than women)

Now, men of higher mate value who have resources and are attractive can achieve reproduction by means of attraction with willing women but what about men of lower mate value?

Men of low mate value who lack resources and are unattractive have extra psychological pressure to achieve reproduction whenever they can and so may resort to sexual aggression and rape in a desperate attempt to pass on their genes.

This is why a huge proportion of rapists tend to be poor and ugly, having a low facial symmetry which indicates poor genetic quality.

This, however, does not mean that only sexually deprived men of low mate value commit rape. In their quest for greater reproductive success, men who achieve mating through the means of attraction can also resort to sexually aggressive tactics in circumstances where costs are outweighed by the benefits.

Take war for example.  Rape is common during wars because not only do the aggressing men eliminate other men who would otherwise guard their women, there’s no law and order that can hold them accountable for their actions during such times of chaos.

Another circumstance in which men, not necessarily of low mate value, can rape is when they come to know about or suspect their partner’s infidelity. Partner rapes, especially during a breakup, comprise a significant proportion of reported rapes.

Concerned by the possibility that some other man may have inseminated her partner, the man uses force to inseminate her so that he can win the sperm competition by beating the other man’s sperm to the egg.

Rape in nature

Humans are not the only animals in which sexual aggression and rape is observed. Although rape is a rarity in the animal kingdom, the males of species as diverse as insects, ducks and monkeys have been observed engaging in sexual coercion to force insemination.

In a male scorpionfly, for example, there’s an organ specifically designed to facilitate sexual access to a female in a coercive manner. It’s a type of hook on its wing that enables it to grip the female as it forces copulation.

Though all males in this species have this organ, they don’t all use it. Females of this species prefer to mate with males who bring them a nuptial gift (a dead insect as food). When a male fails to offer food, females aren’t interested in mating and that’s when the coercive technique is employed by the male.

male scorpionfly
A male scorpionfly with its clamper.

Similarly, small orangutan males who’re unable to achieve copulation through intrasexual competition with other bigger males (small size is not good for intrasexual competition) chase and rape the females.

The white-throated bee-eater is a species of bird in which rapists are those individuals who, after breeding early in the season and raising young with a monogamous partner, embark on raping forays.

They chase any female who is still fertile and who has been left unguarded by a male and attempt to force insemination. Clearly, the males of this species are going for greater reproductive success.



References:

McKibbin, W. F., Shackelford, T. K., Goetz, A. T., & Starratt, V. G. (2008). Why do men rape? An evolutionary psychological perspective. Review of General Psychology, 12(1), 86.

Stanford, C. (2009). Despicable, Yes, but Not Inexplicable.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

psychmechanicsblog February 1, 2017

The Ben Franklin effect: How to turn haters into friends

“He that has once done you a favor will be more ready to do you another than he whom you have yourself obliged.”  – Benjamin FranklinBenjamin Franklin was an 18th-century American statesman, scientist, inventor, musician and author. You probably got introduced to him at a very young age when you read that nursery rhyme, “Early to bed”. Once, a person lambasted him publicly with a long speech. This angered him but instead of taking some kind of an outright revenge, he decided to try something different.He realized that his goal was to turn his hater into a friend because, according to his estimation, this man who’d berated him could one day become very influential.So Ben wrote him a letter asking him if he could lend him a ‘scarce and curious book’. Ben worked at and maintained a library at that time and was widely known for having good literary tastes.Needless to say, the hater was flattered and sent the book eagerly. Next time he met Ben in person he talked to him and ‘ever after manifested a readiness to serve him on all occasions.’The Ben Franklin effect What you just witnessed has come to be known as ‘The Ben Franklin effect’.It states that when we do a person a favor, we tend to like them more as a result- even if we didn’t like the person or hated them initially. In other words, you can effect a favorable change in the attitude of a person toward you just by asking them to do a favor for you.At first, it almost seems like magic but there is a good psychological explanation as to why this happens…Consider how you behave when you’re indecisive. If I offer you a chocolate cake you probably won’t show any indecision and will gladly take and eat it. It just tastes so good.However, if you’re watching your weight and I offer you a chocolate cake, indecision can kick in since the potential cost of eating a chocolate could be weight gain.In order for you to eat the cake, the perceived potential benefit of eating it has to outweigh the potential cost of eating it. ( see why we do what we do and not what we don’t do)While you’re still unable to decide whether to eat the cake or not, let’s say I insist that you eat it and you cave in. At this point, your mind will likely slip into a state of cognitive dissonance because you just did an action that didn’t match your psychological state. You weren’t psychologically prepared to eat the cake.In order to restore stability, your mind now has to invent excuses and rationalizations to justify what you did so that your cognitive dissonance is resolved.So you might say something like, “One piece of cake isn’t going to do any harm” or “I’ll do extra cardio tomorrow morning.”The human mind is designed in such a way that it tries its best to do those actions which carry more benefits than costs. If it fails and ends up doing something that carries more costs than benefits it has to somehow convince itself that it didn’t really fail because the knowledge that we incurred more costs than benefits is difficult to handle.When you ask someone for help and they do help you out, even if they had no good reason to do so, they’ll need to invent one. Since we usually help those whom we like, the person’s mind goes like, “I helped him, therefore I must like him.”“Did you just say you don’t like me? Would you mind passing me that bread, please?”In the incident of Ben Franklin, some other factors were at play too that shouldn’t be overlooked. We like it when someone likes our favorite book, movie or TV show because it helps us boost our ego. (see Why we want others to like what we like).In many cases, hatred is just a way to make yourself look better than your competitor. Often, when someone says “I hate you” what they’re really saying is “I hate how you’re better than me.”Ben Franklin’s hater probably hated him because he knew at a deep level that Ben was better than him- hence the need to lambast him publicly. When Ben fed his depleted ego by asking for help (the helper is at a superior position than the helped), he was pleased and ‘ever after manifested a readiness to serve him on all occasions’.He could now think of Ben as his equal or even as his inferior. But we all know who’s really the clever one and superior one over here.

Filed Under: Influence, Social Engineering

psychmechanicsblog January 24, 2017

Understanding the psychology of social media sharing

Just as what people say and do in real life tells us who they are, how they act on social media reveals their personality too. 

The same underlying motivations that drive the behavior of individuals in real life are at play in the virtual world of social media.

The reasons why people share what they share on social media are numerous but when looked at via the lens of various psychological perspectives, a lot of motivations clear out from the vague haze of random posts, videos, and pictures.

These psychological perspectives are not necessarily mutually exclusive. A single social media behavior could be the result of a combination of motivations highlighted by these perspectives.

Let’s go over these perspectives one by one…

Beliefs and values

You hardly need an in-depth knowledge of human behavior to understand that people like and share stuff on social media that match their beliefs and values.

A guy who favors capitalism, for example, will often post about it. Someone who believes democracy is the ideal form of government will often post about it.

We all have a tendency to reaffirm our beliefs once we’ve formed them. The next psychological perspective explains why…

Ego boost

Our beliefs make up our various identities which in turn make up our ego. Our ego is nothing but a set of beliefs that we have about ourselves. Our ego is how we see ourselves, our image.

The reason why people reaffirm their beliefs is that it helps them maintain or boost their ego. 

If I support socialism then reaffirming the awesomeness of socialism boosts my ego because when I say “Socialism is awesome”, I’m indirectly saying, “I’m awesome because I support socialism which is awesome.” (see Why we want others to like what we like)

The same concept can be extended to one’s preferred political party, favorite sports team, celebrities, car and phone models, etc.

Attention craving

Sometimes what people share on social media is just an attempt to get attention.

We all have an innate need to be wanted, liked and being attended to. But, in some people, this need is exaggerated, possibly because they received little attention from their primary caregivers during childhood.

Attention-seekers post more regularly on social media to replete their ‘attention tanks’. If they feel they’re aren’t getting the attention they want they can go to great extremes to force you to pay attention by posting high shock value stuff such as gory pictures, nudity, etc.

Mate value signaling

Social media provides a great platform for men and women to flaunt their value as a suitable mate. This evolutionary psychological perspective is a powerful factor explaining why people share what they share on social media.

Since men who’re resourceful and ambitious are perceived to be ‘high value’ mates, men often share things that directly or indirectly signal these traits.

This is why you see many men sharing pictures of cars, bikes, and gadgets, even setting these as their profile pictures. Resource signaling in men also includes showing off their intelligence (via humor, for example) and occupational achievements.

Mate value in women is predominantly signaled by physical beauty.

This is why the only activity of some women on Facebook is uploading or changing their pictures.
This is also why women frequently use picturing sharing apps like Instagram that allows them to show off their beauty.

Besides beauty, women signal their mate value by displaying ‘nurturing’ behaviors.

Displaying nurturing behavior allows women to signal, “I’m a good mother and I can take good care of babies with the help of my female friends.”

Ancestral women who were nurturing and formed strong relationships with other women to gather food and raise the young together were more successful reproductively than those who did not have these traits.

This is why you see women posting pictures of them holding a cute baby, animal, teddy bear, etc. and stuff that signals how much they cherish friendships and relationships.


When it’s a woman’s best friend’s birthday, you’re likely to see her post a picture of her and her best friend together, along with something like this written in the caption… 


I see today is the birthday of my sweetheart, my love, my cutie pie Maria. Oh! dear Maria! Where do I start? As soon as I got the notification about your birthday, my mind drifted to those days we spent together, all the fun that we had when we……………..and so on.

On the contrary, men’s birthday wishes rarely go any longer than, “Happy birthday bro”.

Filed Under: needs, Perception

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 24
  • Next Page »

About

Welcome to an aggregator for blogs about social engineering and related fields. Feel free to take a look around, and make sure to visit the original sites.

If you would like to suggest a site or contact us, use the links below.

Contact

  • Contact
  • Suggest a Site
  • Remove a Site

© Copyright 2025 Social Engineering Blogs · All Rights Reserved ·