Social Engineering Blogs

An Aggregator for Blogs About Social Engineering and Related Fields

The Humintell Blog December 29, 2022

Can Humans Judge Animal Emotions? Yes, to an Extent.

animal emotionsMost people can discern how their pet cat or dog is feeling by just listening to them- happy kitties purr and angry dogs growl. But can this insight be extended to wild animals like a cow or a pig?

A new study entitled “Age, empathy, familiarity, domestication and call features enhance human perception of animal emotion expressions” from the University of Copenhagen surveyed more than 1000 people from around the world.

They found that most people can pick up on an animal’s excitement, but not necessarily positive or negative emotions.

The Study

Greenall, et al obtained audio recordings of pigs, horses, goats, and cows as well as wild boars and Przewalski’s horses.

According to Science “The recordings were made while the animals were experiencing certain emotions categorized as either positive, such as a horse readying to eat producing a high-pitched neigh, or negative, such as a hungry horse producing a throaty whine. The trial also included sound bites from human actors, who were recorded saying meaningless sounds in either an angry, fearful, or joyful tone.”

Once the recordings were obtained, the researchers sent the audio files and a survey to volunteers who were from 48 different countries and had the option to take the survey in eight different languages, including Italian, Dutch, and Hebrew.

For each question, they compared two short snippets of vocalizations from a particular species and decided which clip represented a high or low arousal and which vocalization represented a positive or negative emotion.

The Results

Figure 1.
Figure 1. (a) Phylogeny of the species played back in the survey. Correct recognition percentage per species for (b) arousal and (c) valence questions (orange: domestic species; yellow: wild species; grey: humans; binomial test: *0.05 ≤ p < 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.0001, NS = not significant).

Survey participants were able to accurately discern arousal in pigs, horses, and goats more than half of the time. The scores for emotional valence were more variable.

The survey takers were able to differentiate positive from negative vocalizations in humans, goats, horses, pigs, and wild boars at an above average clip, but they struggled to discern which emotions were being vocalized by the cows and wild horses.

Males and females didn’t show a difference in the accuracy of their answers. Instead, younger volunteers (aged 20 to 29 being the best, and ability declining with age) and those who had experience working with animals were better at picking up on both arousal and emotional valence.

The study suggests it may have been evolutionarily advantageous for a wide variety of animals to pick up on the emotional cues of other animals’ vocalizations—a long screech, for example, that may signal to multiple species that a predator is nearby.

Relationship to Empathy

A follow up study conducted by ethologist Elodie Briefer found that people who had higher empathy scores were better at identifying animal emotions from sound alone.

Briefer and her team collected used recordings similar to those of the Greenall, et al which were associated with positive experiences, such as an animal anticipating food or being reunited with a friend. Other sounds were made when the animal was afraid, under stress, or socially isolated.

In addition to discerning positive and negative emotions, participants were also asked to complete an empathy questionnaire based on the interpersonal reactivity index.

This index measures four empathetic traits: their tendency to adopt other people’s points of view, feel sympathy for others, experience distress when others are in need, and imagine themselves in fictional situations.

Interestingly, people who scored highly for empathy were better able to understand the meaning of the animal sounds.

This research suggests all us mammals have a shared emotional system.

The post Can Humans Judge Animal Emotions? Yes, to an Extent. first appeared on Humintell.

Filed Under: Emotion, Science

The Humintell Blog December 2, 2022

Do You Suffer From Facial Bias aka Face-ism? The Answer is Likely Yes.

Don’t think you’d judge a book by it’s cover? Think again. Past research has shown that adults and children regularly use faces to make judgments about the character traits of others, even with only a brief glance.

Now new research supports the idea of facial bias aka face-ism- an extreme tendency to judge people based on their c.

Look at the two faces below created by researcher Lisa DeBruine. Would you hire these people? Who looks more intelligent? Would you trust either person?

In fact the images above are composite images, with each one having been created by combining four different faces. And even though these faces aren’t real, you may still have made a snap decision about each composite person’s competence based on their facial expression and structure.

Making quick judgments about how much we should trust someone, how dominant they are likely to be, or how intelligent they are can be useful estimates of personality. But this can also, unfortunately, lead to stereotyping – for example, thinking that people with a particular physical characteristic must all be untrustworthy.

Drastic Conclusions?

Recent research from Japan suggests something more worrying; that some of us have a disposition to draw drastic conclusions about the traits and personalities of others based solely on facial appearance.

In a series of online studies with 312 participants, Scientist Atsunobu Suzuki and colleagues asked participants to  complete two rounds of surveys. The first was to assess the participants’ belief in established stereotypes, while the second was to analyze the extent to which participants made judgments on personality traits based on facial features.

They found what they call “face-based trait inferences” (FBTIs). Essentially face-based trait inferences are when subjects make a series of personality judgments having taken a brief look at someone’s face.

While everyone makes FBTIs to some degree, they discovered that some people only make extreme judgments (both positive and negative). This held even when the age, sex and ethnicity of participants were controlled for.

People with attractive faces tended to be judged as having desirable traits, like trustworthiness and competence, and more masculine-looking faces tended to be perceived as less trustworthy. Whether this tendency for facial bias was innate or learned was not determined.

Young Children Form First Impressions From Faces

Research also shows that just like adults, children as young as 3 tend to judge an individual’s character traits, such as trustworthiness and competence, simply by looking at the person’s face.

The research, led by psychological scientist Emily Cogsdill of Harvard University, shows that the predisposition to judge others based on physical features starts early in childhood and does not require years of social experience.

the researchers had 99 adults and 141 children (ages 3 to 10) evaluate pairs of computer-generated faces that differed on one of three traits: trustworthiness (i.e., mean/nice), dominance (i.e., strong/not strong), and competence (i.e., smart/not smart).

After being shown a pair of faces, participants might be asked, for example, to judge “which one of the people is very nice.”

As expected, the adults showed consensus on the traits they attributed to specific faces. And so did the children.

Children ages 3-4 were only slightly less consistent in their assessments than were 7-year-olds . But the older children’s judgments were in as much agreement as adults’, indicating a possible developmental trend.

Overall, children seemed to be most consistent in judging trustworthiness, compared to the other two traits. This suggests that children may tend to pay particular attention to the demeanor of a face – that is, whether it is broadly positive or negative.

Societal Implications

As you can imagine, having facial bias can have serious real-world implications when it comes to important decision making, like who to vote for or whether a suspect is guilty of a crime.

Research has shown that being made aware of your biases can lead to a change of mindset in the short term, but people need extra interventions periodically to make any real behavior change last.

“We believe that this finding is important because such individuals should be a prime target for intervention to reduce the biasing impact of facial appearance on interpersonal judgments and choices,” Suzuki said.

The post Do You Suffer From Facial Bias aka Face-ism? The Answer is Likely Yes. first appeared on Humintell.

Filed Under: Science

The Humintell Blog November 9, 2022

How Nonverbal Communication Is Going Digital

In a recent BBC Worklife article, Joanna York suggests that we’re used to reading body language and silent cues in person but with remote work, subtle ways we communicate are changing – and workers need to know how to adapt.

The global pandemic certainly changed the way we interact. In fact, one 2021 Beezy survey detailing digital workplace trends shows that 54% of professionals now attend more (virtual) meetings than they used to pre-pandemic (in-person). Moreover, close to half of the respondents (43%) said they now attend between 4 and 7 more meetings per week than they used to pre-pandemic.

Nonverbal Communication in the Workforce 

In a previous blog we described how it’s true that when communicating digitally, the visual stimulation of a person’s behavior or in their facial expressions is almost the same as being face to face, especially given the level of technology that we have now. In addition, your auditory perception (hearing ability) is present, since you can clearly hear the other person’s tone of voice.

But there are clearly some substantial differences between being live vs virtual, including a reduction in nonverbal communication and nonverbal behavior.

What are some of those differences?

In a live context when we interact with others, we receive what Dr. Matsumoto calls “full nonverbal packages” which include:

  • The face and facial expressions
  • Voice
  • Gestures
  • Body posture
  • Leg, hand and foot movements

In-person we also have the additional nonverbal cues such as the ability to sense spacing between one another, hear sounds, and experience various smells.

Virtually we have much less of these observable cues and it’s harder to read body language in general. You typically cannot see the whole body and therefore cannot see many of the body movements from the waist down that you can typically see live.

There are more distractions: on screen, you can see yourself and focus on what you look like. People’s backgrounds are static. It’s easy to pay less attention to the person you’re speaking to.

Here are 6 tips on how to communicate effectively virtually:

1. Turn on your camera and unmute yourself

While you may be tempted to turn your video off or press mute, it may not be the best idea. In fact, a 2022 survey of 200 executives showed that 92% of managers believed that employees who turned off their cameras during meetings were less likely to have a long-term future at their company.

Public speaking coach AnnMarie Baines agrees, “I have observed more people using the virtual world to hide and avoid the fear public speaking completely. By turning off our cameras and putting ourselves on mute, it is easier to opt out of public speaking and observe discussions at a distance, as opposed to being spotlighted and risk judgment and uncertainty.”

2. Create a context that is conducive to have work meetings

If possible, carve out a physical workspace at home and treat that space like you would a work environment. If you have a meeting, dress like you’re going to a meeting. Context matters!

See what you look like before the meeting; check your camera angle. Check your background, sounds, lighting to ensure it’s appropriate.

3. Stay focused on the interaction and value your connection to your audience

It’s easy to get distracted and to think that others not paying attention. Data has also shown that during video calls, factors like camera angles, distance from the camera and ability to make eye contact all impact how likeable people are perceived to be.

York describes how eye contact particularly is positively associated with likeability, social presence, and interpersonal attraction. Yet making eye-contact on a video call requires us to go against our natural instincts as it requires you to look into the camera when you speak. Like anything, it takes practice!

4. Use nonverbal cues to confirm understanding

Use nonverbal cues – faces and voices – along with verbal content and confirm understanding. These remote meetings may take longer, and we may need to make more effort to make sure we’re all on the same page. Ask questions. Confirm understanding verbally. Not being on the same page can have dire consequences.

5. Expect and embrace discomfort

covid-19, remote communication and body languageCommunicating over a webcam may be uncomfortable. That said, for many, public speaking has always been an uncomfortable and somewhat unnatural experience, even before the pandemic hit.

Many speakers and performers use visualization techniques, where they prepare themselves by imagining the result they want. Instead of imagining situations where you don’t feel any nerves at all, it can help to imagine the jitters you might have at the start and then imagine them disappearing as you sink into the moment and connect with your audience.

It can also help to embrace the reality that public speaking will sometimes feel awful, but also that the discomfort won’t last forever — sometimes, it is only a few minutes.

6. Record and re-watch

If your service allows recording of your interactions, check out how you come off. It’s a great learning experience to see yourself.

The post How Nonverbal Communication Is Going Digital first appeared on Humintell.

Filed Under: Nonverbal Behavior

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • …
  • 279
  • Next Page »

About

Welcome to an aggregator for blogs about social engineering and related fields. Feel free to take a look around, and make sure to visit the original sites.

If you would like to suggest a site or contact us, use the links below.

Contact

  • Contact
  • Suggest a Site
  • Remove a Site

© Copyright 2026 Social Engineering Blogs · All Rights Reserved ·