Social Engineering Blogs

An Aggregator for Blogs About Social Engineering and Related Fields

The Humintell Blog April 24, 2024

The Key Ingredients to Effective Intercultural Interactions

What are the Key Ingredients to Effective Intercultural Interactions?

Dr. David Matsumoto, Director of Humintell, recently led a free webinar where he provided participants with an overview of major research findings concerning keys to effective intercultural communication, as well as practical tips to interact with others from different cultures.

Most of us live in a multi-cultural society where effective intercultural communication is crucial. This is as a result of technology and other advancements. The world is getting smaller every day!

The Difference Between Cross-Cultural Adaptation vs Adjustment

Dr. Matsumoto believes at the heart of all intercultural communication and interactions is a process of adaptation and adjustment. Many scholars do not delineate between these two concepts.

Adaptation refers to the process of altering one’s behavior to fit in with a changed environment or circumstances.

Adjustment refers to the subjective experiences that are associated with, result from, or are consequences of, adaptation, and that motivate further adaptation. Dr. Matsumoto explains adjustment in laymen’s terms as “how we feel about what we’re doing”.

Living in any society in any culture requires a constant process of adaptation and adjustment, as noted in the above graphic. This process also encapsulates the underlying process of growth.

Defining Successful Intercultural Communication

How does Dr. Matsumoto define successful intercultural communication?

He outlines 4 factors that play a part, as seen in the graphic below.

  1. Having successful relationships with people from other cultures.
  2. Feeling that interactions are warm, cordial, respectful, and cooperative.
  3. Accomplishing tasks in an effective and efficient manner.
  4. All of the above, and the ability to manage psychological stress effectively.

Research has shown there are a lot of different types of people in terms of how they adapt and adjust in different cultures.

There’s many people who adapt (change their behaviors) but don’t adjust well. Adjustment problems may manifest itself in depression or anxiety or substance abuse problems.

Then there’s people who feel things are perfectly fine but they’re not adapting well.

Adaptation and adjustment go hand in hand when discussing intercultural interactions and intercultural communications.

The Contact Hypothesis (Allport, 1954)

So what does the science say about intercultural adjustment and communication?

One very important concept is called the Contact Hypothesis which is the proposition that contact between groups is effective in reducing prejudice.

One study that tested the contact hypothesis was known as The Robbers Cave Experiment where two group of boys were invited to participate in a summer camp (which in reality was part of a study in intergroup relationships).

The boys were separated into two groups (Rattlers and Eagles) and when the groups were unaware of each other, group activities were directed at building unity and cohesion.

During the second week, the two groups were brought together in a competitive environment where the other group became an obstacle to resources.

It was during this competitive period that the groups became hostile toward one another, calling each other names and even engaging in physical fights.

After a period of conflict, the groups participated in a superordinate goal and hostile feelings between groups were reduced after researchers allowed the groups to work cooperatively.

The Robbers Cave Experiment showed that when two groups feel mutually interdependent, hostility between groups subsides.

Key Psychological Ingredients to Effective Intercultural Competence

There’s also a large body of research that have examined what key psychological ingredients (skills, traits, abilities) can help intercultural competence effectiveness.

The instruments that have been developed examine traits have been shown across the last 50 years to be indicative of effective cross-cultural communication.

These tests include the Multicultural Personality Questionnaire (MPQ), Cultural Intelligence Scale (CQS), and Intercultural Adjustment Potential Scale (ICAPS).

A 2013 study entitled Assessing Cross-Cultural Competence: A Review of Available Tests by Matsumoto and Hwang reviewed the validity of all existing instruments.

They found that the most important predictor of successful cross-cultural adaptation was emotional robustness aka emotion regulation.

Learn More About The Basics of Emotional Intelligence by Clicking Here.

Negative emotional reactions from cultural differences are inevitable. Adapting to these differences well require people to regulate their emotions well so they can acquire new skills and behaviors.

Final Tips and Advice for Next Steps

Dr. Matsumoto concluded his webinar by offering some helpful tips.

1. Get exposure to different people and cultures

2. Engage in activities or training to improve your own emotion regulation skills

He ended the webinar by playing the video below about Tarra and Bella- The elephant and dog who became best friends.

The post The Key Ingredients to Effective Intercultural Interactions first appeared on Humintell.

Filed Under: Cross Culture, culture

The Humintell Blog April 15, 2024

Understanding Human Behavior with Dr. David Matsumoto

Humintell Director David Matsumoto recently appeared on the Social-Engineer Podcast: The Doctor Is In Series – where they discuss understandings and developments in the field of psychology.

In their latest episode, Social Engineer CEO Chris Hadnagy and Director of Education Dr. Abbie Marono interview Dr. Matsumoto on the topics of emotion and nonverbal communication.

The Origins of Human Emotion

They began the podcast by speaking about the origins of human emotion where he addressed claims that facial expressions of emotion are not innate or universal in nature.

Dr. Matsumoto points out that the thought that emotions are not innate and entirely constructed is actually a minority thought or concept within the field itself, although it gets a lot of traction.

Matsumoto’s Olympic Study

They discuss Dr. Matsumoto’s famous Olympic Judo Study entitled Spontaneous Facial Expressions of Emotion of Congenitally and Noncongenitally Blind Individuals.

This study was conducted at the 2004 Athens Olympic and Paralympic Games where photographs were taken during medal matches in the judo competition.

From these images, Dr. Matsumoto and his team were able to study the first reactions of these judo athletes when they won or lost a medal match.

The results of this study of 84 athletes from 34 countries, showed that winners were immediately smiling. Losers generally showed sadness or disgust or anger. Importantly, there were no cultural differences in these reactions.

Additional images were taken of Paralympic athletes, many of them who were congenitally blind from birth. Researchers compared the images of the sighted and non-sighted athletes and found an amazing amount of similarity between them.

This research (and many others like it) suggests that the capacity to have emotions and facial expressions of emotion is biologically innate.

Behavioral Indicators of Mal-Intent

The conversation then shifted to discussing behavioral indicators of malicious intent.

Dr. Matsumoto emphasizes that much of his research and work has focused on immediate threats and is relevant for those who work at security checkpoints or in harm’s way. He delved into some of the research he’s conducted and their results.

A Writer’s Obligation

They discuss the anonymity and human factors that affect behavior as well as Dr. Matsumoto’s 7th Edition of his book Culture and Psychology.

He emphasizes that he now wants to focus his energy and knowledge on helping others.

The post Understanding Human Behavior with Dr. David Matsumoto first appeared on Humintell.

Filed Under: Emotion, Science

The Humintell Blog March 21, 2024

Study: We Use “Baby Talk” With Our Dogs But Not Baby Faces

“Who’s so cute? Yes you are. You’re so cute, aren’t you?” Baby talk sounds pretty similar whether we’re cooing to babies or our dogs.

In fact, research has even suggested that dogs’ brains are sensitive to the familiar high-pitched “cute” voice tone that adult humans (especially women) use to talk to babies.

But an interesting new study entitled “The face behind the caring voice: A comparative study on facial prosodic features of dog-, infant- and adult-directed communication” has has spotted a crucial difference:

When baby talking to infants, our faces tend to be overly expressive—wide-open eyes, high eyebrows, and exaggerated smiles. With dogs, we’re far more stoic, researchers report in a new study in Applied Animal Behaviour Science.

Dogs and Baby Talk

Scientists have been studying baby talk with dogs (and more recently, cats) for more than 40 years. In fact research has found similarities between infant and dog brains during the processing of speech with such a high-pitched tone feature.

But little work has been done on the facial expressions that go along with the baby talk.

Anna Gergely, an evolutionary biologist and dog owner wondered whether there might be differences between how we coo to our fur babies and our human ones. So she designed a study to answer that question.

Dog Study Methodology

In the new study, Gergely and her colleagues recruited 23 Hungarian couples who had both a baby between 6 months and 18 months old and a pet dog.

While visiting the families in their homes, the researchers asked the parents to speak three short monologues individually to the dog, the baby, and the other parent.

The monologues involved things like teaching a new word, reciting a nursery rhyme, or reading a script of everyday sentences such as, “What nice weather!”

Gergely and her colleagues filmed the parents’ faces while they were speaking to their partner, pet and infant. Later, the researchers used “face-reading” software to analyze the parents’ facial expressions and muscle movements.

Dog Study Results

Gergely’s study suggested that the parents’ faces were the most intensely expressive—with more exaggerated expressions—when talking to their babies, especially when reciting the nursery rhyme and scripted sentences.

The facial expression recognition software ranked their expressions as particularly happy and often evoking surprise, Gergely says.

By contrast, participants had the least amount of facial muscle movement and the most neutral expressions when they were talking to their dogs—even though they seemed to be using a voice nearly identical to what they used with their babies.

Dr. Matsumoto’s Thoughts

Dr. Matsumoto thinks it is far fetched to suggest that humans talking to dogs know or have memorialized different meanings of faces in the animal kingdom.

Instead he suggests that there are many possible reasons why humans may be more expressive with infants than with their canine companions.

Here are a few:

1. When humans talking to infants they are even more animated, which requires additional signaling. In turn, this additional signaling recruits more behaviors, including faces. Another difference not discussed is that human – infant signaling is stronger, i.e., more intense.

2. Humans unconsciously speak animatedly for infants to learn about how to read facial expressions. This is less important for other animals.

3. Infants can verbalize many different emotional states, and can thus refer to them in their facial expressions. Infants will learn about multiple states and their links to language. This is less important and not required for animals.

What do you think about the possibilities Dr. Matsumoto outlined above? Which do you think is most plausible?

The post Study: We Use “Baby Talk” With Our Dogs But Not Baby Faces first appeared on Humintell.

Filed Under: Emotion, Science

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • …
  • 560
  • Next Page »

About

Welcome to an aggregator for blogs about social engineering and related fields. Feel free to take a look around, and make sure to visit the original sites.

If you would like to suggest a site or contact us, use the links below.

Contact

  • Contact
  • Suggest a Site
  • Remove a Site

© Copyright 2025 Social Engineering Blogs · All Rights Reserved ·