Social Engineering Blogs

An Aggregator for Blogs About Social Engineering and Related Fields

The Social Influence Consulting Group Blog August 3, 2014

Surround Yourself With The Skills You Do Not Possess

Surround Yourself I am a big fan of the concept surround yourself with the skills you do not possess.  This can mean seeking out a individual different to yourself, working with someone who extends your thoughts and takes it somewhere new or perhaps engaging a whole team that have strengths you do not possess.

I have recently been working on a design piece and I knew I didn’t like what we had, I just didn’t know why.  As part of the larger brief I decided to engage a marketing agency that could provide some specialist skills in concept and branding.

At one of the firms I visited I was comfortable form the start.  I have followed their work for almost 12 months and have been impressed.  I liked them. From the first meeting there was a connection.  We were speaking the same language and it just seemed to fit.

So I told them that I had walked in with a brief but also a problem.  The problem as I mentioned above was the design element I didn’t like but I didn’t know why.  I gave them the back-story on the company.  We explored the nuances and where opportunity lay.  They wanted a week to think about things and were very clear that they wanted me to come back to look at the ‘draft’ before they presented it to the entire leadership group. Great use of Liking and kicking the relationship off through no-risk cooperation.

With a great deal of anticipation I went back to see them this week.  We did the social thing up front and Liking was certainly at play.  We spoke around all sorts of topics and laughed and after about 15 minutes we got into the presentation.  They presented some background on their methodology and provided an overview on the specifics of what we were about to be shown.  They provided plenty of praise for the brief we had delivered and the specific nature of the deliverables.

I deliberately took a female colleague with me to both meetings because the goal we were seeking to achieve is a corporate brand that appeals to women and she was far more qualified than I to make a call on that.  Seated, anticipation piqued.  The Director of the company stood, walked out of the room and came back with a portfolio.  It was face down and this little piece of Scarcity (i.e. I couldn’t see the design work they had done) was killing me.

They said, what they had developed was just to see if they understood the brief and developed entirely from what I said I wanted.  Great use of Consistency, as they were about to pitch me something in my own words.  They told me if they didn’t get it right they would go back and rethink it – a nice Contrast to some others we had spoken to and as an Authority they were willing to admit upfront if they didn’t get it right but they would go away and fix it.

All the while the director was tapping on the documents, which I still couldn’t see, and this was making me a little distracted with impatience.

Finally, he turned the one and only concept around.  I looked at it and then looked at my colleague.  And we both smiled.

What they presented was there all along.  It was integral to everything we had discussed, yet we were far too close to see it.  This team, with their fresh set of eyes, took what we had told them, and had given it back to us with their own spin.  A clearer and crisper version of what we had said.

So the question is, could we have come up with this on our own?  The answer is no.  We had too much baggage and were too close to it.  Were they any smarter than us?  The answer is again no.  They asked the right questions and listened to what we said in order to understand what we were trying to show but couldn’t.  Did they possess skills we did not possess?  Yes.  The depth and quality of the concept was amazing and this was only possible by listening to what we wanted and more importantly to what we didn’t.

In that moment, we were emotionally connected to the concept, the one we had given them, but the one they had gone to the effort of drafting.  And then they asked, “Are we pitching against anyone else?”  And I said, “As of now.  No!”

Implication for you

Sometimes you can bang around for ages on a persuasive problem.  Thinking about how best to approach your target of influence.  Thinking about the stakeholders involved and their attitude toward your proposal.  But I would always encourage you, that once you have thought about the principles of persuasion that are available to you, always sense check it with someone else to see what you have missed.  Perhaps present it to knowledgeable others long before you get stuck, to ensure you maintain momentum.  If they see something you don’t, it doesn’t mean they are smarter than you, it just means they are not burdened with the same biases and filters you are, having worked on the problem for so long.

Remember:  No one person can know everything.  Therefore surround yourself with the skills you do not possess.   Tell them what you are thinking and let others contribute to your success!

The post Surround Yourself With The Skills You Do Not Possess appeared first on Social Influence Consulting Group.

Filed Under: Influence, Liking, Reciprocity, Scarcity

The Social Influence Consulting Group Blog July 20, 2014

Three Source Rule

In over five years of writing this blog I have had very few rants or stood on my soap box.  But today I am going to put something out there and see what you think…

Is it okay for them to report incorrect information?  I think not.

This week I heard on three separate occasions journalists reporting so called “facts” about the Malaysian MH17 disaster in the Ukraine and on all three occasions the person they were interviewing had to correct them because the points they were reporting as fact had already been proven as incorrect and reported as so.

In a relatively new phenomenon, the rush to be the first with the news and remain relevant, i.e. beating Twitter and Facebook posts, seems to have journalists rushing to air without checking their sources ensuring what they are saying is correct.  Ten years ago this would have been unheard of.  Mainly because historically journalists cultivated sources, they dug and dug deep and investigative journalism was something to be admired.  Today I am not so sure.  It seems the good investigative journalists are being bypassed or asked to simply convey what they are observing because their tradecraft takes too long and by the time they come to the public with the full story the news cycle has moved on and their story may no longer topical.

As an Intelligence Officer with the police we followed something called the Three Source Rule.  It is a simple and effective rule and it basically states wherever possible try and corroborate any piece of information via three independent sources.  While it was not always possible it was a great rule of thumb.  The one caveat was, and this is where the work came in, you needed to follow the information and ensure the three sources came about the information in a separate, credible and reliable way.  Basically we needed to check one person wasn’t running around making stuff up and everyone else was just talking about what they had been told by that person.

Bringing my little media issue full circle.  I am concerned that as information is recycled and reposted, one piece of incorrect information can quickly be re-reported by multiple blogs, social media and even traditional media and what was previously speculation is now confirmed as fact because everyone is reporting the same information.

What do you think?  Is our need for fast news eroding the authority of journalists who are forced to report whatever they can quickly and just apologise for it later?

The role of media is very important and it can sway public opinion very quickly, I just think it should be based on a little more than Chinese whispers.

Leave a comment and let me know what you think.

 

The post Three Source Rule appeared first on Social Influence Consulting Group.

Filed Under: Influence, Media, SICG

The Social Influence Consulting Group Blog July 6, 2014

Cheeky Request – What Would You Have Done?

This week I received an email from a MM reader, Darren about a cheeky request he received and I want to see how you feel about it and what you would have done if it happened to you.

Darren stated he received an email from a telecommunications consultant that been helping him switch to his product/service. In the email the service provider advised he had activated Darren’s global roaming and it was now available for use.

However he closed the email with the following request:

Can I be really cheeky?……. and ask you if you’ve got any companies that you might be able to refer me to?

Darren stated the provider has been good with the service he provides and he does go “above & beyond”.

I asked Darren how the request made him feel and he said his immediate response was it was a cheeky request indeed.

Darren felt that the request had put him on the spot, cheeky or not, and he felt pressure to provide a referral – which he didn’t want to do.

We understand the pressure Darren was experiencing was coming from the pull of Reciprocity.   The service provider had done a good good job and gone “above and beyond” for Darren and now he was looking to collect by asking for a favour in return.

The question is was this an equitable exchange?  Darren was paying the telecommunications advisor for his service after all and going above and beyond is perhaps his unique differentiator in the marketplace.

The telling part of the story for me was Darren said he waited almost two days to respond due to the discomfort.  During the two days he mulled over what to say before eventually replying with a non-committal statement saying,

 Trying to think of any organisations where they have a need for 5+ mobiles etc – will think to mention you to them as I interact with them to see if they are receptive to an approach.

Darren told me that he probably won’t follow through with this commitment because of the way the request was made and how it made him feel.

 

Here is your chance to interact.  Tell me how you would have reacted.  Was the request okay or not?  As Sleuth of Influence what advice would provide the service provider to persuade Darren to provide a referral without making him feel uncomfortable or obligated.

I am really looking forward to your views on this one – I have plenty I will share as we get going.

 

Cheeky request

 

 

·

The post Cheeky Request – What Would You Have Done? appeared first on Social Influence Consulting Group.

Filed Under: Influence, Reciprocity

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 15
  • Next Page »

About

Welcome to an aggregator for blogs about social engineering and related fields. Feel free to take a look around, and make sure to visit the original sites.

If you would like to suggest a site or contact us, use the links below.

Contact

  • Contact
  • Suggest a Site
  • Remove a Site

© Copyright 2025 Social Engineering Blogs · All Rights Reserved ·