Social Engineering Blogs

An Aggregator for Blogs About Social Engineering and Related Fields

The Humintell Blog January 17, 2019

How Many Faces Can You Recognize?

many-faces-facial-recognition

Who is that person in your office? On your bus? On the television?

Many of us are constantly barraged with different faces, and it can be hard to keep track or even to remember some familiar faces at all! Yet, why is this?

In a recent paper in the Proceedings of the Royal Society, a team of researchers sought to analyze whether we create a sort of list or catalogue of faces that we know. In other words, how many faces are we capable of remembering at any given time? While they find an average of about 5000 remembered faces, individual variation seems to play a huge factor in one’s ability to recognize faces.

Importantly, this is not a paper describing what our memory is capable of knowing. Rather, they are trying to determine how many faces people tend to keep in their working memory. Interestingly, most anthropological research finds that humans tend towards small groups of maybe 100 people, but this must be contrasted with the demands of modern society to recognize a multitude of faces every day.

There are, of course, many types of facial recognition, broadly speaking, that complicate this effort. For instance, we may recognize people’s faces whom we have never met or even never seen in person, or we could fail to recognize someone when seen in a novel context. For precision, this paper sought to look at whether facial recognition held up when seeing a familiar face in such novel contexts.

This was evaluated using an experimental design. Participants were exposed to a series of 3441 public figures and asked which they recognized. These were randomly interspersed with slight variations of those same faces an additional 3441 times, so each face was seen twice. This allowed researchers to see if the face was recalled from a previous exposure.

This is only one type of facial recognition, however, as the researchers had to grapple with the multitude of people that we do see every day and know personally. This was looked at by giving participants clear criteria for what constituted a facial memory and asking them to write detailed self-reports of those whom they know personally, including people that they might just happen to see every day on the bus.

When combining recall rates of famous figures with accounts of people known personally, they relied on statistical methods to derive an average estimate of about 5000 people, though this faced incredible individual variance from about one to ten thousand, depending on the participant.

These same individual differences were present during each attempt at a robustness check. This means that researchers subset participants in different fashions and also that they changed recall measures to less stringent cases. For instance, this involved looking not at whether they recognize both famous faces in a pair but if they recognize either picture.

You might very well ask, what exactly does this teach us about facial recognition? One this it does tell us is that people have incredibly different abilities to recognize faces in such contexts. Some people may be very bad at doing so, for instance.

Still, given how intertwined facial recognition is with emotional recognition, this is not about some innate ability to recognize either one. Instead, it can be trained like any other skill, which is exactly what Humintell is here for!

Filed Under: Memory, Science

The Humintell Blog January 8, 2019

Microexpressions Differentiate Truths from Lies about Future Malicious Intent

Finally! The first scientific evidence that microexpressions are a Key to Deception Detection!

While there has been a general consensus that microexpressions play a significant role in deception detection for decades, in reality there had never been a research study published in a peer-reviewed, scientific journal that documented that claim.

Until now.

New and exciting evidence comes from Humintell’s own Drs. David Matsumoto and Hyisung Hwang in a recently published paper in Frontiers in Psychology. In their study, they sought to determine whether microexpressions could reliably indicate deception in a mock crime experiment. Ultimately, they found that microexpressions served as a helpful guide both in detecting deceit and also in evaluating future misconduct.

In actuality, previous studies did try to document the effect of microexpressions as deception indicators. But past research did not assess microexpressions effectively. An experiment was conducted featuring a mock crime. Here, participants were told to either lie or tell the truth during a simulated interview. Both the prescreening interview and the actual experiment were modeled as closely as possible on real-world law enforcement procedures.

Because past research has found that microexpressions are universal culturally, participants included both U.S. born European-Americans and Chinese immigrants. Throughout the interviews, each participant was filmed and their expressions closely analyzed.

After performing these mock interviews, facial behaviors were hand coded by experts to determine whether microexpressions were present. Emotions were then grouped as either negative, such as fear and anger, or positive, such as happiness.

It turned out that liars and truthtellers had starkly different expressions manifestations, with liars showing markedly more negative microexpressions. Not only does this help show that negative microexpressions can be used to determine deception, but the average duration of these microexpressions was relatively constant as between 0.4 and 0.5 seconds.

This study, then, not only provided the first scientific evidence that microexpressions can help detect deception, but it also helped foster further research in looking critically at what constitutes a microexpression.

And it may be a good time for you to participate and learn how to detect deception yourself!

READ THE FULL ABSTRACT AND DOWNLOAD THE FULL ARTICLE

Filed Under: Deception, Science

The Humintell Blog January 2, 2019

Getting New Year’s Resolutions Right

happy-new-year-2019New Year’s resolutions are tricky things to do correctly, and most people tend to give up on them pretty quickly.

But that doesn’t have to be the case. In a helpful article in Forbes, life coach Rosie Guagliardo helps identify some of the challenges with keeping on resolutions. Overall, she emphasizes the need to fully understand why we are making our resolutions and why the goals are important to us.

Perhaps surprisingly, less than 10 percent of people who make resolutions manage to stick with them a whole year. Part of the problem, according to Guagliardo, comes from the fact that we tend to make resolutions on specific measurable goals, like losing a certain amount of weight.

Instead, we need to think about what outcomes we really value. Are we trying to lose weight? Or feel healthier and have more energy? If it’s really the latter, then that needs to be our resolution.

She argues that situating our resolutions in deeply desired outcomes, rather than superficial goals, makes us actually motivated to accomplish them. It may even lead us to realize the superficial goals, like weight loss, as a path towards our more desired outcomes.

As a concerted resolution strategy, Guagliardo recommends selecting three desired outcomes. For each, she recommends actions that will realize each, urging us to specifically schedule time for these actions. This will foster a sense of ritualized behavior, where the regularity increases our commitment.

Of course this does not mean that setbacks won’t happen. However, within this framework, she provides a series of cognitive steps that can help manage these. Namely, we need to verify whether we are having setbacks because we really don’t want the outcome we claim to.

She urges us to think critically about whether this is an outcome we really want. Is it an actual desire or some form of obligation? The latter will be much harder to stick with. It might help to take a moment to visualize the outcome and to think about whether we would prefer to live that way.

This sort of visualization may also involve us thinking about the outcome as a preparation. Maybe we don’t care that much about having more energy as such but are excited at the idea that this would allow us to realize a certain ambition that requires more energy, like taking up dance or hiking more.

However, it’s important to realize that in a busy time, we may simply not feel that we have the energy to accomplish any of these tasks.

It might then be helpful to partner up with someone who has similar goals. This can help keep us on track. Moreover, situating our desires in a goal based in happiness can also help encourage us to keep going, even if it seems hard.

Hopefully these are some helpful tips for all of you. You might also want to review our blog from a couple years ago that helps outline some tips for making resolutions in the first place.

Regardless, we wish you luck and a very happy 2019!

Filed Under: General

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • …
  • 277
  • Next Page »

About

Welcome to an aggregator for blogs about social engineering and related fields. Feel free to take a look around, and make sure to visit the original sites.

If you would like to suggest a site or contact us, use the links below.

Contact

  • Contact
  • Suggest a Site
  • Remove a Site

© Copyright 2025 Social Engineering Blogs · All Rights Reserved ·