Social Engineering Blogs

An Aggregator for Blogs About Social Engineering and Related Fields

Anger & The Internet

stockvault-laptop-work113048

Courtesy of StockVault

A new study has found that anger is the most influential emotion in online interactions.  These findings are from research by Beihang University  and acquired by looking at “Weibo” a Chinese social network similar to Twitter but with twice as many users.

Researchers looked at over 70 million “tweets” if you will over a six month period. Rage was the emotion that was most likely to spread across from this social media site. It could spark angry “tweets” up to 3 degrees of separation from the original source.

What does this tell us about social media, and why is it so much easier to rage at a screen than at a person?

According to USA Today, although this is really a study of the Chinese social media mindset there are some compelling parallels with the mindset of the Western Twitter community.

In a past blog on Hate Reading, we noted similar findings among Western social media sites from Twitter to Facebook, “Some research suggests that downward emotional comparisons can improve people’s well-being.”

“Some research suggests that downward emotional comparisons can improve people’s well-being.” – See more at: http://www.humintell.com/2013/10/hate-reading-on-social-networking-sites/#sthash.YHRmTuBr.dpuf

While it has been known that one person’s emotions can influence another’s feelings it is newly discovered and very interesting that the Internet has the ability to magnify negative emotions.

ate Reading, mostly of social media sites, provides us with “satisfaction from fury-fueled engagement with someone who should theoretically not provide it.” – See more at: http://www.humintell.com/2013/10/hate-reading-on-social-networking-sites/#sthash.YHRmTuBr.dpuf

Studies from  2004 noted that people act out more intensely and frequently online than they would in-person for obvious reasons.  USA Today goes onto note that new theories suggest that subconsciously talking on a computer can seem more like talking to ourselves.

It’s very difficult to link words on a screen with the reality that there’s a living breathing human being on the other end of the connection.

Do you have any Pertinent ideas about Anger and the Internet?
ate Reading, mostly of social media sites, provides us with “satisfaction from fury-fueled engagement with someone who should theoretically not provide it.” – See more at: http://www.humintell.com/2013/10/hate-reading-on-social-networking-sites/#sthash.YHRmTuBr.dpuf
ate Reading, mostly of social media sites, provides us with “satisfaction from fury-fueled engagement with someone who should theoretically not provide it.” – See more at: http://www.humintell.com/2013/10/hate-reading-on-social-networking-sites/#sthash.YHRmTuBr.dpuf
ate Reading, mostly of social media sites, provides us with “satisfaction from fury-fueled engagement with someone who should theoretically not provide it.” – See more at: http://www.humintell.com/2013/10/hate-reading-on-social-networking-sites/#sthash.YHRmTuBr.dpuf

The Pursuit of Ignorance

 What does real scientific work look like?

Neuroscientist Stuart Firestein, professor at Columbia University, implies that Ignorance is far more important to discovery than knowledge.

 

Click here to view the embedded video.

Firestein gets to the heart of science as it’s really practiced and suggests that we should value what we don’t know — or “high-quality ignorance” — just as much as what we know.  Ignorance, he implies, is far more important to discovery than knowledge.   Firestein jokes: Real Science looks a lot less like the scientific method and a lot more like “farting around … in the dark.”

What is your take on Ignorance, do you think it’s that important?

Empathy, Empowerment and Teenagers

stockvault-my-people103332

Photo courtesy of StockVault

As most of us know either from our own kids or interaction with other’s kids, teenagers can be moody, confusing and seem to lack empathy.  How can we cultivate sensitivity in our teens, especially teen boys?

New research published in Developmental Psychology,  shows that biology, not parenting, is to blame for insensitive and selfish behavior by teenagers.

The Wall Street Journal reports that cognitive empathy, the mental ability to take others’ perspective, begins rising steadily in girls at age 13.  However, boys don’t begin to show gains in perspective-taking until age 15, which helps in problem-solving and avoiding conflict.

What’s more interesting is that adolescent males actually show a temporary decline, between ages 13 and 16, in a related skill—affective empathy, or the ability to recognize and respond to others’ feelings.  Fortunately, the boys’ sensitivity recovers in the late teens. Girls’ affective empathy remains relatively high and stable through adolescence.

This study co-authored by Jolien van der Graaff, a doctoral candidate in the Research Centre Adolescent Development at Utrecht University in the Netherland, is an expansion on researchers’ current understanding of cognitive growth during adolescence.

According to a 2012 research review co-authored by Ronald Dahl, a professor of public health at the University of California at Berkeley, researchers used to believe that both forms of empathy were fully formed during childhood.

It is now clear that “the brain regions that support social cognition, which helps us understand and interact with others successfully, continue to change dramatically“ in the teens, says Jennifer Pfeifer, an assistant professor of psychology at the University of Oregon in Eugene. Preliminary research in her lab also suggests cognitive empathy rises in teens. The discoveries serve as a new lens for exploring such teen behaviors as bullying and drug abuse.

Cognitive empathy versus affective empathy, arises in a different part of the brain, the medial prefrontal cortex, verses the limbic region where affective empathy is grounded. Affective empathy begins in infancy imitating how to treat others from what one is exposed to.

So why do boys have less cognitive empathy than girls, one answer is that decline in affective empathy (which predicts an individuals level of cognitive empathy)  among young teenage boys may spring, in part, from puberty when testosterone increases, sparking a desire for dominance and power. Boys who were more mature physically showed less empathy than others.

What are your thoughts on cognitive empathy?