Thank you to all our great Expression of the Month photo submissions.
We have chosen our Grand Prize Winner!!
An Aggregator for Blogs About Social Engineering and Related Fields
Thank you to all our great Expression of the Month photo submissions.
We have chosen our Grand Prize Winner!!
Courtesy of StockVault
A new study has found that anger is the most influential emotion in online interactions. These findings are from research by Beihang University and acquired by looking at “Weibo” a Chinese social network similar to Twitter but with twice as many users.
Researchers looked at over 70 million “tweets” if you will over a six month period. Rage was the emotion that was most likely to spread across from this social media site. It could spark angry “tweets” up to 3 degrees of separation from the original source.
What does this tell us about social media, and why is it so much easier to rage at a screen than at a person?
According to USA Today, although this is really a study of the Chinese social media mindset there are some compelling parallels with the mindset of the Western Twitter community.
In a past blog on Hate Reading, we noted similar findings among Western social media sites from Twitter to Facebook, “Some research suggests that downward emotional comparisons can improve people’s well-being.”
“Some research suggests that downward emotional comparisons can improve people’s well-being.” – See more at: http://www.humintell.com/2013/10/hate-reading-on-social-networking-sites/#sthash.YHRmTuBr.dpuf
While it has been known that one person’s emotions can influence another’s feelings it is newly discovered and very interesting that the Internet has the ability to magnify negative emotions.
ate Reading, mostly of social media sites, provides us with “satisfaction from fury-fueled engagement with someone who should theoretically not provide it.” – See more at: http://www.humintell.com/2013/10/hate-reading-on-social-networking-sites/#sthash.YHRmTuBr.dpuf
Studies from 2004 noted that people act out more intensely and frequently online than they would in-person for obvious reasons. USA Today goes onto note that new theories suggest that subconsciously talking on a computer can seem more like talking to ourselves.
It’s very difficult to link words on a screen with the reality that there’s a living breathing human being on the other end of the connection.
Do you have any Pertinent ideas about Anger and the Internet?
ate Reading, mostly of social media sites, provides us with “satisfaction from fury-fueled engagement with someone who should theoretically not provide it.” – See more at: http://www.humintell.com/2013/10/hate-reading-on-social-networking-sites/#sthash.YHRmTuBr.dpuf
ate Reading, mostly of social media sites, provides us with “satisfaction from fury-fueled engagement with someone who should theoretically not provide it.” – See more at: http://www.humintell.com/2013/10/hate-reading-on-social-networking-sites/#sthash.YHRmTuBr.dpuf
ate Reading, mostly of social media sites, provides us with “satisfaction from fury-fueled engagement with someone who should theoretically not provide it.” – See more at: http://www.humintell.com/2013/10/hate-reading-on-social-networking-sites/#sthash.YHRmTuBr.dpuf
What does real scientific work look like?
Neuroscientist Stuart Firestein, professor at Columbia University, implies that Ignorance is far more important to discovery than knowledge.
Click here to view the embedded video.
Firestein gets to the heart of science as it’s really practiced and suggests that we should value what we don’t know — or “high-quality ignorance” — just as much as what we know. Ignorance, he implies, is far more important to discovery than knowledge. Firestein jokes: Real Science looks a lot less like the scientific method and a lot more like “farting around … in the dark.”
What is your take on Ignorance, do you think it’s that important?