Social Engineering Blogs

An Aggregator for Blogs About Social Engineering and Related Fields

The Humintell Blog February 7, 2023

How Communicating Through a Screen Affects Your Brain

Zoom. Microsoft Teams. Messenger. FaceTime. Skype. You’re probably familiar with all these video conferencing platforms and since the COVID-19 pandemic, people have been using them more than ever before.

As we mentioned in a past blog, one 2021 survey shows that 54% of professionals now attend more (virtual) meetings than they used to pre-pandemic (in-person).

But how does communicating through a screen affect the brain, particularly in kids?

Until now, little research has been done on the impact of technology-enhanced communication on the social brain.

Recently a research team led by Guillaume Dumas, a professor at the University of Montreal wanted to answer the question: could technologically mediated interactions have neurobiological consequences that interfere with the development of social and cognitive abilities?

The Study and Results

For this study, Dumas and his research team compared brain electrical activity during face-to-face interaction and technologically assisted remote communication in 62 mother-child pairs in which the children were aged 10 to 14.

Using a technique called hyper-scanning, which can simultaneously record brain activity in multiple subjects, the research team found that interaction via a videoconferencing platform attenuated mother-child brain synchrony.

The study found that face-to-face interactions elicited nine significant cross-brain links between frontal and temporal areas of the brain, whereas remote interactions generated only one.

If brain-to-brain synchrony is disrupted, we can expect consequences for the child’s cognitive development, particularly the mechanisms that support social interaction and these are life-long effects.

Societal Impacts

Dr. Matsumoto is not surprised by these findings. Humans did not evolve to do 2-dimensional communication, such as through a computer screen. On the contrary, we have evolved our perceptual senses to live in a 3-dimensional world and our sense of reality is grounded in that fact.

According to researcher Dumas, the study’s findings can also be extrapolated to adults and may explain the widespread “Zoom fatigue” following the rise in videoconferencing during the COVID lockdowns.

Since online interactions produce less brain-to-brain synchrony, it is understandable that people would feel they have to expend more effort and energy to interact, the interactions seem more laborious and less natural.

Dumas believes the study confirms that social relationships are critically important to humans and that inter-brain mechanisms are linked to the development of the social brain.

It seems like humans are interconnected by a technology more potent than Zoom or Teams: our brains.

Harmful Effects of Screens

Dumas’ latest research adds to the growing body of evidence regarding the harmful effects of screens.

A longitudinal cohort study out of Singapore suggests that greater exposure to screen time during infancy was linked to poor self-regulation and brain maturity at age eight.

Another study has suggested that soothing a child with digital devices may lead to more problems with emotional reactivity down the road.

In the study published in the JAMA Pediatrics, researchers looked at 422 parent and caregiver responses.

They found that parents and caregivers who frequently using digital devices to distract from unpleasant and disruptive behavior like tantrums was associated with more emotional dysregulation in kids — particularly boys and children who were already struggling with emotional regulation.

Dr. Jenny Radesky, associate professor of behavioral sciences at the University of Michigan Medical School says,

When you see your 3- to 5-year-old having a tough emotional moment, meaning they are screaming and crying about something, they’re getting frustrated, they might be hitting or kicking or lying on the floor. … If your go-to strategy is to distract them or get them to be quiet by using media, then this study suggests that is not helping them in the long term.

Other Alternatives to Screen Time

Zones of Regulation

Instead of distraction, Radesky recommends taking tantrums and emotional dysregulation as opportunities for adults to teach children how to identify and respond to emotions in helpful ways. Here are some of her tips:

1. Get Comfy

Instead of punishing their expressions of frustration, anger or sadness with a time-out, it can be a good idea to set up a comfy place for kids to collect their feelings — maybe something with beanbags or blankets or a tent.

2. Name the Emotion

It can be helpful for caregivers to help kids name their emotions and offer solutions when they are responding inappropriately to those feelings.

3. Use Color Zones

Sometimes talking about emotions are too abstract for preschool-age kids, and in those cases Radesky recommended using color zones to talk about emotions.

Calm and content can be green; worried or agitated can be yellow; and upset or angry can be red, using graphics or images of faces to help kids match what they’re feeling with what color zone they are in. To reinforce it, adults can talk about their own emotions in terms of colors in front of their kids, Radesky said.

You and your child can go through the colors together and write down calming tools for the different zones, she added.

The post How Communicating Through a Screen Affects Your Brain first appeared on Humintell.

Filed Under: General

The Humintell Blog January 20, 2023

Understanding and Managing Anxiety, with Derya Ozes, LMFT

Humintell’s Sayaka Torra recently sat down with Derya Ozes to discuss understanding and managing anxiety. Derya is a Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist at DeryaTherapy and has been in practice for over 10 years.

During their 25 minute conversation, they discussed how the pandemic has affected anxiety management, their personal experiences with anxiety, and more.

Humintell is an APA Approved CE provider for psychologists and therapists. You can find out more about our CE Course offerings here.

The last several years has been challenging for so many people (myself included) and has revealed the importance of discussing mental health issues and various emotional states. From a therapist’s perspective, how has the pandemic affected anxiety and anxiety management in particular?

Derya emphasized the importance of understanding anxiety and that understanding anxiety is in essence understanding disruptions and change.

Anxiety generally manifests itself in psychological and somatic expressions of worry and fear, especially in situations where we may feel we don’t have a lot of agency or influence over.

Derya states that there’s definitely a relationship between the pandemic and increased anxiety levels. The pandemic caused major disruption and change in many of our routines that make us feel anchored and grounded. These routines were essential in helping us feel a sense of stability in our lives.

When we have a sense of stability, that is when we feel compelled to go beyond our basic survival needs. We develop hobbies and take part in social engagements.

The pandemic essentially invited disruption and change in all the main domains in our life.


When you talk about disruption and change, I think everyone can relate to that. Here in the Bay Area we went through a pretty strict lockdown where we had our daily routines uprooted. Can you speak about how disruptions are critical to understanding anxiety and how disruptions affect anxiety?

Derya states that in order to understand anxiety, it’s important to understand what NOT having anxiety looks like.

Not having anxiety involves a sense of psychological safety. We feel psychologically safe when we have rhythms in place that allow us to feel anchored in our day-to-day and week-to-week.

When those rhythms are taken away, it’s very common to feel psychologically disoriented.

Derya emphasizes that although the word “disruption” may have a negative connotation, there are also good disruptions. In different developmental stages of our lives, we make decisions that invite change such as getting married, having a child, moving a new community, and being promoted.

Did you know? Research shows that it takes on average 1-3 months in order for us to adapt to something new. This pertains to change that we ourselves have invited (known as intrinsic change).

In contrast, if there’s an external factor (extrinsic change) that causes change, it generally takes 4-8 months in order for us to adapt.

Derya emphasizes that part of managing change is managing how much change you bring into your life.

PRO TIP: If you can avoid multiple disruptions at the same time, you should avoid it.

Understanding One's Own EmotionsWhen you spoke about “good disruptions” that really resonated with me. I experienced a lot of anxiety after the birth of my son and it was a huge shift to adapt to my new role as a mom. I was curious to know about your personal experience as a therapist, dealing with anxiety through the pandemic. How has it affected your role as a therapist and how have you managed that for yourself?

Derya said the question reminded her of a conversation she had years ago with one of her mentors. At the time she had multiple disruptions in her life and her mentor reminded her that although she has all kinds of knowledge and tools as a therapist, she’s human first.

Everyone has a different capacity for change and a different way of processing and adapting to change. Something that may be challenging to one person may take them one day to process. For some people it may take weeks for them to process the same challenge.

Derya emphasizes that knowing yourself is important- having an awareness of your own patterns and ways you process emotion.

PRO TIP: If you are anticipating change in your life, be proactive about setting yourself up for success. Put stepping stones to anchor yourself around something.

Derya reflected on some personal changes she’s gone through in the recent past and how those changes have affected her.


Those are all really great tips and some of them I’ve never heard of (see graphic above). Above all, remembering that you’re human first and that sometimes you can do everything “right” and still feel anxious and that’s okay. Do you have any closing thoughts?

Derya explains that oftentimes when we are in an exciting and new part of our lives, we often assume it’s going to be a certain way forever. She emphasizes seeing and validating when the emotional shifts happen.

We often hold ourselves to a very high standard and forget to give ourselves the same level of grace and reassurance we give others. When you’re managing change it’s important to have some self empathy. Be connected to your friends or your special person. Reach out to professionals and have those difficult conversations especially if you’re struggling.

PRO TIP: Check in with yourself in the form of journal entries or lists. Ask yourself how you’re feeling grounded and what kind of changes you may need to make to feel more anchored. 

The post Understanding and Managing Anxiety, with Derya Ozes, LMFT first appeared on Humintell.

Filed Under: Emotion

The Humintell Blog December 29, 2022

Can Humans Judge Animal Emotions? Yes, to an Extent.

animal emotionsMost people can discern how their pet cat or dog is feeling by just listening to them- happy kitties purr and angry dogs growl. But can this insight be extended to wild animals like a cow or a pig?

A new study entitled “Age, empathy, familiarity, domestication and call features enhance human perception of animal emotion expressions” from the University of Copenhagen surveyed more than 1000 people from around the world.

They found that most people can pick up on an animal’s excitement, but not necessarily positive or negative emotions.

The Study

Greenall, et al obtained audio recordings of pigs, horses, goats, and cows as well as wild boars and Przewalski’s horses.

According to Science “The recordings were made while the animals were experiencing certain emotions categorized as either positive, such as a horse readying to eat producing a high-pitched neigh, or negative, such as a hungry horse producing a throaty whine. The trial also included sound bites from human actors, who were recorded saying meaningless sounds in either an angry, fearful, or joyful tone.”

Once the recordings were obtained, the researchers sent the audio files and a survey to volunteers who were from 48 different countries and had the option to take the survey in eight different languages, including Italian, Dutch, and Hebrew.

For each question, they compared two short snippets of vocalizations from a particular species and decided which clip represented a high or low arousal and which vocalization represented a positive or negative emotion.

The Results

Figure 1.
Figure 1. (a) Phylogeny of the species played back in the survey. Correct recognition percentage per species for (b) arousal and (c) valence questions (orange: domestic species; yellow: wild species; grey: humans; binomial test: *0.05 ≤ p < 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.0001, NS = not significant).

Survey participants were able to accurately discern arousal in pigs, horses, and goats more than half of the time. The scores for emotional valence were more variable.

The survey takers were able to differentiate positive from negative vocalizations in humans, goats, horses, pigs, and wild boars at an above average clip, but they struggled to discern which emotions were being vocalized by the cows and wild horses.

Males and females didn’t show a difference in the accuracy of their answers. Instead, younger volunteers (aged 20 to 29 being the best, and ability declining with age) and those who had experience working with animals were better at picking up on both arousal and emotional valence.

The study suggests it may have been evolutionarily advantageous for a wide variety of animals to pick up on the emotional cues of other animals’ vocalizations—a long screech, for example, that may signal to multiple species that a predator is nearby.

Relationship to Empathy

A follow up study conducted by ethologist Elodie Briefer found that people who had higher empathy scores were better at identifying animal emotions from sound alone.

Briefer and her team collected used recordings similar to those of the Greenall, et al which were associated with positive experiences, such as an animal anticipating food or being reunited with a friend. Other sounds were made when the animal was afraid, under stress, or socially isolated.

In addition to discerning positive and negative emotions, participants were also asked to complete an empathy questionnaire based on the interpersonal reactivity index.

This index measures four empathetic traits: their tendency to adopt other people’s points of view, feel sympathy for others, experience distress when others are in need, and imagine themselves in fictional situations.

Interestingly, people who scored highly for empathy were better able to understand the meaning of the animal sounds.

This research suggests all us mammals have a shared emotional system.

The post Can Humans Judge Animal Emotions? Yes, to an Extent. first appeared on Humintell.

Filed Under: Emotion, Science

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • …
  • 276
  • Next Page »

About

Welcome to an aggregator for blogs about social engineering and related fields. Feel free to take a look around, and make sure to visit the original sites.

If you would like to suggest a site or contact us, use the links below.

Contact

  • Contact
  • Suggest a Site
  • Remove a Site

© Copyright 2025 Social Engineering Blogs · All Rights Reserved ·