Social Engineering Blogs

An Aggregator for Blogs About Social Engineering and Related Fields

The Humintell Blog June 10, 2025

Pandemic Kids Struggle to Recognize Happy and Fearful Faces


A large Danish study called The effects of Covid-19 related policies on neurocognitive face processing in the first four years of life was recently published in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

The study authored by Carlijn van den Boomen, Anna C. Praat, Caroline M.M. Junge, and Chantal Kemner investigated the effects of Covid-19 related measures on two facets of face processing in children aged 5 months to 3 years:

  1. Face categorization (differentiating between faces and houses)
  2. Emotional face processing (differentiating between happy, fearful, and neutral facial expressions of emotion)

Their research showed that babies and toddlers who grew up during the pandemic struggled to differentiate between happy and fearful facial expressions of emotion.

The children studied showed a marked difficulty in processing happy facial expressions, which the researchers believe was due to the limited variety of face-to-face interactions during the pandemic.

Background

The researchers wanted to study whether social restrictions introduced during the pandemic, such as reduced in-person interactions and widespread mask-wearing, may have shaped early brain development.

Studies have shown that infants are sensitive to emotions expressed through facial expressions since their first year of birth. In fact, a study published in PLOS ONE, suggests that fetuses even practice their own facial expressions while in utero!

The team wanted to know:

  • Whether a reduced variety of facial exposure might influence how children process faces and how quickly they do so.
  • Whether children can distinguish between different facial expressions of emotion (known as emotional face processing).

The Methodology

To investigate the questions above, the researchers used electroencephalography (EEG) to measure brain activity in over 900 children aged 5 months, 10 months, and 3 years.

462 children were tested before the onset of the pandemic, while 473 others were tested between March 2020 and April 2022 when COVID-19-related isolation and mask wearing policies were in place.

By testing the children at these different time periods, this allowed researchers to compare brain responses in children who had typical social exposure to those whose early years were shaped by limited social interactions and more frequent mask use in adults.

In the first part of the study, children passively viewed a series of images that included neutral faces, faces showing the facial expression of happiness, faces showing the facial expression of fear, and houses.
EEG recordings focused on event-related potentials (ERPs), patterns of electrical activity that occur in response to specific stimuli. The researchers analyzed three well-known ERP components linked to face processing.

The Results

1. Faster Face Processing

When it came to how quickly the brain responded to faces, the researchers found no meaningful differences in 5 or 10-month-old infants between those tested before and during the pandemic.

However, in three-year-olds, there was a notable difference.

Young children tested during the pandemic showed earlier responses to faces than their pre-pandemic counterparts, indicating faster neural processing of facial information.

The finding of faster face processing was somewhat unexpected.

In typical development, the speed at which the brain processes faces increases with age and experience.

However, some previous research in adults has shown that reduced facial information — such as when faces are masked — can lead to quicker processing.

2. Face Categorization

In contrast, the ability to tell the difference between faces and non-facial objects, known as face categorization, appeared unaffected by the pandemic.

Across all age groups, children tested before and during the pandemic showed similar patterns of brain activity when viewing faces versus houses.

This suggests that this fundamental aspect of face processing is resilient and may not depend as strongly on a wide range of facial experiences.

3. Reduced Differentiation of Emotional Expressions

One of the most striking findings emerged when the researchers examined how children responded to emotional expressions.

Children tested before the pandemic showed distinct patterns of brain activity when viewing happy, fearful, and neutral faces. But among those tested during the pandemic, this differentiation was reduced or absent.

In both ten-month-olds and three-year-olds, brain responses to happy and fearful faces became less distinguishable, especially in the later ERP components, which are thought to reflect attention or familiarity.

These differences were particularly driven by a reduced neural response to happy faces.

While children in the pre-pandemic group showed stronger brain responses to happy expressions, those tested during the pandemic had weaker responses.

This pattern suggests that happy faces were either less familiar or attracted less attention in the post-pandemic group.

Explanations

  1. The researchers propose several possible explanations for their findings:
  2. The variety of happy expressions that children saw may have decreased during the pandemic, due to both mask-wearing and the emotional toll experienced by caregivers.
  3. If children saw fewer smiling faces, their brains may have become less attuned to recognizing and reacting to them.

The brain’s emotional face processing system is known to be shaped by experience, especially during early development.

Just as infants need to see a variety of faces to build a robust mental representation of them, they may also need a range of emotional expressions to learn how to distinguish them.

Consequences

This study is significant not only for parents but also for policymakers, as it demonstrates the broader societal impacts of pandemic-era policies.

Facial expressions of emotion are important cues in social and cognitive learning. As such, the limited processing of such cues can have far-reaching consequences for the further development of children.

This is important to know for policy makers, and for parents of and individuals working with children that were 0-4 years old during the pandemic.

Moreover, this insight could also benefit children born in non-pandemic times children, as they benefit from a variety of social experiences as well.

Limitations

The study does come with some limitations.

While the researchers inferred that children tested during the pandemic had reduced facial input, they did not measure the exact nature or frequency of children’s social interactions.

Researchers suggest it’s possible that some families maintained relatively typical social environments, while others experienced more extreme isolation.

Other factors, such as parental stress, mental health, and daycare attendance, may also have influenced the outcomes.

Additionally, while brain activity patterns were measured, the study did not assess behavioral responses, such as whether children could label or respond appropriately to different facial expressions.

Dr. Matsumoto’s Thoughts

The results of this study are not surprising, given the growing number of studies demonstrating the negative and somewhat deleterious effects of the use of masks on facial emotional expression recognition and identification in young children.

These negative effects are expected, given the importance of the exposure of the emotional expressions of others in human (and nonhuman) socio-emotional development.

These findings also dovetail with the many deleterious effects of the lack of play with others in childhood over the past several decades. Play with others is incredibly important for learning valuable skills, including problem solving, self- and emotional-regulation, communication, dispute resolution, and many others.

All of these skills are also vitally important in adulthood as well; and learning to read other’s facial expressions of emotion lays at the core of many of these skills.

These emotional detriments that have occurred because of the decrease in play and especially masking during the Covid pandemic may have serious effects for years to come.

Yet, we can all do something to self-correct, which would involve making greater efforts to allow our kids to interact with others, play outside, and deal with problems on their own, all of which can be facilitated by making sure our children learn to read facial expressions of emotion.

The post Pandemic Kids Struggle to Recognize Happy and Fearful Faces first appeared on Humintell | Master the Art of Reading Body Language.

Filed Under: Parenting, Science

The Humintell Blog May 21, 2025

Guest Blog Post: Turning Crisis into Opportunity


Guest blog post by Ron Holloway, CEO, Holloway Resilience Solutions

 

In today’s uncertain world, leaders must be prepared to guide their teams through crises. Success during challenging times isn’t about avoiding adversity, but rather facing it with the right mindset and approach.

One of the most effective methods I use in coaching leaders is rooted in logotherapy principles and benefit finding, which help individuals not only survive but thrive during periods of disruption. The key is to frontload resilience, both logistically and psychologically, to transform crises into opportunities.

Seeing the Big Bad Wolf as a Fur Coat, Not Fangs

In times of crisis, most people instinctively focus on the fear and danger—the “big bad wolf” with sharp fangs. But what if we shift our perspective? What if instead of seeing the wolf as a threat, we view it as a valuable asset, like a fur coat that can keep us warm? This is the essence of benefit finding: reframing challenges in a way that reveals hidden advantages.

Crises often reveal vulnerabilities in organizations, but they also expose opportunities for growth, transformation, and innovation. Leaders who embrace this mindset can help their teams not only weather the storm but come out stronger on the other side.


Emotional Intelligence in Leadership Webinar


Frontloading Resilience: Logistical and Psychological Preparation

Resilience is a combination of preparation, adaptability, and mindset. By frontloading resilience, we equip leaders and their teams to face crises head-on with confidence and clarity. This involves two key components:

  • Logistical Resilience: This includes preparing systems, processes, and infrastructures to withstand disruptions. Whether it’s supply chain flexibility, business continuity planning, or ensuring robust communication networks, logistical preparation ensures that when a crisis hits, the company can continue to function effectively.
  • Psychological Resilience: The psychological side is equally critical. Using logotherapy, which emphasizes finding meaning in adversity, we help leaders and teams see beyond immediate fears and focus on the larger purpose. This involves cultivating a mindset where challenges are viewed as catalysts for growth and innovation. It’s about framing the crisis not as an existential threat but as a stepping stone toward something greater.

Logotherapy in Action: Finding Meaning in Adversity

Logotherapy, developed by Viktor Frankl, teaches that humans can endure almost any hardship if they find meaning in it. In a business context, this means that when teams are aligned with a clear mission and purpose, they can face even the most difficult challenges with greater resilience.

When crises occur, I work with leaders to reconnect with their organization’s mission. This could involve refocusing on customer needs, finding new market opportunities, or identifying ways to innovate under pressure. By doing so, teams shift from a mindset of survival to one of purpose-driven action. They stop fearing the crisis and start seeing it as a chance to reaffirm their values and pursue new avenues of growth.

Practical Steps for Leaders to Build Resilient Teams

Here are some actionable steps leaders can take to frontload resilience in their organizations:

  1. Conduct a Pre-Crisis Audit: Evaluate the logistical strengths and weaknesses of your organization. Ensure there are contingency plans for various scenarios and that critical systems can function during disruptions.
  2. Build Psychological Safety: Foster an environment where team members feel supported, even when mistakes happen. Encouraging open dialogue about fears and uncertainties can reduce the emotional impact of a crisis.
  3. Frame Challenges as Opportunities: Regularly practice reframing challenges. Discuss past crises and how they were overcome. Identify areas where adversity led to unexpected gains or innovations.
  4. Develop a Crisis Mission Statement: Create a clear mission for how the team will navigate crises. This should align with the company’s values and emphasize the opportunity to grow stronger, not just survive.
  5. Practice Benefit Finding: During times of stress, encourage teams to actively seek out benefits from challenges. Whether it’s finding efficiencies, identifying new market needs, or streamlining processes, the ability to “find the fur coat” in the wolf’s threat is a critical skill.

Conclusion

Crisis doesn’t have to be feared—it can be leveraged. By frontloading resilience through logistical and psychological preparation, and embracing the principles of logotherapy and benefit finding, leaders can turn crises into opportunities.

With the right mindset, the “big bad wolf” becomes an asset, not a threat. Your teams will emerge stronger, more focused, and more aligned with the organization’s mission.

For more insights on how to build antifragile teams and thrive in times of uncertainty, visit Holloway Resilience Solutions.

The post Guest Blog Post: Turning Crisis into Opportunity first appeared on Humintell | Master the Art of Reading Body Language.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

The Humintell Blog April 4, 2025

Dogs May Use Blinking To Bond With Other Dogs

Did you know? The subtle nonverbal exchange of blinking back at someone who blinks at you helps humans and primates bond. Now according to a new study, dogs may also use blinking as a form of connecting to other canines.

In their study entitled “If you blink at me, I’ll blink back. Domestic dogs’ feedback to conspecific visual cues“, researchers out of the University of Parme, “investigated the behavioral and physiological responses of 54 domestic dogs to videos of conspecifics performing blink”.

Research has already shown domestic dogs tend to blink more around other dogs. They also appear to blink to keep the peace with their canine companions—and humans as well—when tensions rise.

The Methodology

puppy-dog-eyesLead researcher Canori and her colleagues created a variety of 12-second videos of a terrier, a cocker spaniel, or a border collie looking at the camera. In some clips, the dogs were blinking, and in others, they weren’t.

A third set of videos showed the dogs licking their noses, a well-known gesture that can signal eagerness or frustration in dogs.

The researchers then edited the videos and strung them together into 71-second clips. In clips with blinking and nose licking, these movements occurred every 4 seconds throughout the clip.

The team then showed the videos on a large screen and in random order to each of 54 adult pet dogs of various breeds who had never interacted with the dogs in the videos.

Researchers outfitted the canine viewers with heart monitors to assess their emotional reactions and also filmed them to spot blinking and other behaviors.

The Results

A few of the dogs got bored and fell asleep but the rest blinked about 16% more on average when watching the other dog blinking than during the two other kinds of scenes.

They found that when dogs witnessed other dogs blinking, they were more likely to blink. They compared these habits to the other behaviors such as nose licking and remaining still and attentive.

Interestingly, only the blinking caused the mimicry effect. Experts suggests that this nonverbal behavior is similar to when we see others yawn and then yawn ourselves.

The researchers suggests that blinking has been a means to express non-aggressive intentions towards members of their own species.

Reciprocal blinking in dogs might help to:

  • Facilitate social bonds
  • Cope with frustration
  • Communicate non-aggressive intentions

Similar to yawning, researchers believe this behavior is related to emotion contagion; the phenomenon when someone’s emotions lead to or produce similar emotions to others.

Even if the blinking is purely reflexive, the results suggest dogs have evolved to use it in meaningful ways.

Researcher Francesconi notes the animals showed no signs of stress in their faces or heart rates while watching the videos.

“Blinking could be a way, for example, to signal, ‘I’m relaxed, and you can be, too.’”

The post Dogs May Use Blinking To Bond With Other Dogs first appeared on Humintell | Master the Art of Reading Body Language.

Filed Under: Emotion, Nonverbal Behavior, Science

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 276
  • Next Page »

About

Welcome to an aggregator for blogs about social engineering and related fields. Feel free to take a look around, and make sure to visit the original sites.

If you would like to suggest a site or contact us, use the links below.

Contact

  • Contact
  • Suggest a Site
  • Remove a Site

© Copyright 2025 Social Engineering Blogs · All Rights Reserved ·