Social Engineering Blogs

An Aggregator for Blogs About Social Engineering and Related Fields

The Humintell Blog August 23, 2025

Junk Food Fuels Violence? The Science of Diet & Aggression


When it comes to understanding violent or aggressive behavior, we often focus on psychology or environment. But there’s a hidden factor most people overlook: diet.


Read: Another perspective on understanding anger

Recent studies suggest that junk food consumption can influence emotional stability, aggression, and even violent tendencies—especially among teens and young adults.

In this article, we explore what the science says about the link between junk food and violent behavior and what you can do about it.

How Junk Food Affects Brain Health and Emotional Regulation

Junk food is typically high in:

  • Refined sugar
  • Saturated fats
  • Artificial additives
  • Salt and preservatives

It is low in essential nutrients like:

  • Omega-3 fatty acids
  • Magnesium, zinc, and iron
  • Vitamins B6, B12, D, and folate

These nutrients are critical for brain function and impulse control.

Without them, people—especially adolescents—are more prone to irritability, emotional instability, and impulsive behavior.

Research-Backed Evidence Connecting Junk Food and Aggression

1. Ultra-Processed Foods and Bullying in Teens

A large-scale Brazilian study linked consumption of ultra-processed foods (snacks, soda, packaged sweets) with increased bullying and deviant behavior in adolescents.

“Deviant behaviors accounted for nearly 40% of the psychological aggression observed.”

📖 Study Source

2. Western Diet Patterns and High Aggression Scores

In an Iranian study of teenage girls, adherence to a Western diet (fast food, sugar, soft drinks) was significantly associated with higher levels of aggression.

📖 Study Source

3. Fast Food and Anger: A Two-Way Street

A U.S.-based longitudinal study of young adults (18–28) found that:

  • Frequent fast food consumption predicted future anger episodes
  • Anger and irritability also predicted future junk food cravings

📖 Study Source

Biological Mechanisms: How Junk Food Can Trigger Aggression

1. Neurotransmitter Disruption

Nutrient deficiencies impair dopamine and serotonin, affecting mood and impulse control.

2. Brain Inflammation

Processed food increases inflammation in the brain, particularly in areas tied to emotional regulation (like the amygdala).

3. Blood Sugar Crashes

High sugar intake causes mood swings, fatigue, and irritability, creating the perfect storm for emotional outbursts.

4. Gut–Brain Axis Breakdown

Diets low in fiber and micronutrients disrupt gut microbiota, reducing mood-regulating short-chain fatty acids.

Junk Food and Violence in Correctional Facilities

Several studies have shown a strong link between improved nutrition and reduced aggression in prisons:

Inmates given better diets and supplements experienced up to a 45% drop in disciplinary infractions.
A UK study published in the British Journal of Psychiatry showed a 26.3% reduction in violent behavior with dietary changes.

📖 Study Review – PMC10888116

Adolescents Are Most at Risk

Teenagers are especially vulnerable because:

  • Their brains are still developing
  • Emotional regulation centers (like the prefrontal cortex) are still maturing
  • They often consume the highest levels of junk food

Combined with academic pressure and hormonal shifts, this makes them more susceptible to aggression linked to poor diet.

What Can Be Done? Solutions and Interventions

✅ 1. Promote Whole Foods in Schools

Replace vending machines with fruit, nuts, and yogurt.

✅ 2. Nutrition Education

Teach students and parents how food affects behavior, not just physical health.

✅ 3. Reform Institutional Food Systems

Prisons, schools, and group homes should integrate brain-healthy meals.

✅ 4. Support Further Research

Government and academic institutions should invest in more studies on diet and aggression.

Is Junk Food Making Us Mean?

While junk food doesn’t cause violent behavior on its own, it amplifies emotional instability, especially in already vulnerable populations.

With mounting evidence showing the connection between junk food and violent behavior, it’s time to treat diet as a public mental health issue—not just a physical one.

Dr. Matsumoto’s comments:

As a person who was raised on junk food in the 1960s, I find the recent research that has begun to undercover the possible close connection between diet and what happens in our gut and many different physical and mental health outcomes incredibly interesting and important.

The fact that there may be a link between junk food and how we regulate our emotions and behavior is not surprising to me.

That especially reinforces for me the thought that improving our emotional intelligence and wellness – both physically and mentally – starts with having better wellness baselines.

These wellness baselines revolve around six domains:

No matter what techniques we engage in to improve our emotional intelligence – breathing, meditation, critical incident analysis, whatever – their effects are all magnified by having better wellness baselines in the first place.

Of course making changes in anything we’ve done all our lives is difficult, whether in our lifestyle of emotional styles.

Perhaps we can start by making one small change, like cutting out that soda or bag of chips once a week. Even a journey of a 1,000 miles begins with the first step!

The post Junk Food Fuels Violence? The Science of Diet & Aggression first appeared on Humintell | Master the Art of Reading Body Language.

Filed Under: Science

The Humintell Blog August 6, 2025

Smiling Boosts Mood- Even When it’s Forced


A recent study from the University of Essex entitled, “Smiling and Frowning Induced by Facial Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (fNMES) Modulate Felt Emotion and Physiology” explored whether electrically induced smiling could influence emotions.

Participants had electrodes placed over their zygomaticus major muscles—those that lift the corners of the mouth.

A gentle electrical current forced a smile or a frown for about five seconds, while researchers measured how positive or negative they felt afterward .

When participants were made to smile, even briefly and subtly, they rated their mood more positively, particularly when paired with pleasant images.

Conversely, forcing a frown nudged mood ratings downward—even if participants weren’t consciously aware of the induced expression .

While the emotional shifts were modest, the effect was striking given that only a few specific muscles were activated—and only for seconds at a time.

Why This Matters: Smiling and Mood

These findings breathe new life into the longstanding facial feedback hypothesis—the idea that our facial expressions can shape how we feel.

Though prior methods like the classic “pen-in-mouth” technique produced mixed results (especially in replication attempts in 2016), the precision of electrical stimulation offers a more controlled way to test how expression directly impacts emotion .

Smiling boosts mood, the study found—even when it’s not genuine.

That mirrors other research showing that adopting a smile (even fake) can trigger neurochemicals like dopamine, serotonin, and endorphins—your brain’s natural mood regulators .

What This Means for You

Smiling—even forced—can lift your spirits. If you’re having a rough moment, trying a simple smile might engage neural pathways that bias perception toward positivity.

Facial feedback plays a real, albeit subtle, role in mood modulation. Even small activations of smiling muscles—without emotional imagery—can influence how we feel.

Future applications may go beyond experiments. Some researchers propose wearable devices or therapies that gently stimulate smile muscles to support mood, particularly in mood disorders, though this remains exploratory .

Real-World Angle: How Humintell Readers Can Use It

If you’re curious about applying this to everyday life:

Try holding a slight, intentional smile for 30 seconds. Even if it feels unnatural, the facial feedback may still trigger a mood shift.

For those engaged in emotional training or coaching: teaching controlled smiling—even in the absence of feeling it—might help reinforce positive internal states.

Although electrical stimulation therapy is not yet consumer-ready—and not a substitute for professional mental health interventions—it signals a new frontier in understanding how smiling boosts mood through physiological feedback.

Caveats & Notes

The mood effects were small, and participants often weren’t consciously aware of being made to smile.

Long-term effects remain unknown, and ethical considerations must guide real-world use of facial stimulation.

Smiling is only one factor: meaningful emotional resilience depends on multiple lifestyle and psychological strategies .

Key Takeaways

  • Smiling—even a forced one—can boost mood, supporting the facial feedback hypothesis.
  • Experiment shows a brief electrical smile nudged self-reported positivity.
  • Though the effects are mild, they underline how smiling boosts mood, even without genuine emotion.
  • This opens possibilities for novel mood-regulation approaches, especially when combined with emotional training or clinical care.

This research reinforces how subtle muscle movements can influence internal experience—and it’s a strong reminder that your face doesn’t just express emotion—it helps create it.

Can Smiling Improve Your Mood? Research Says Yes.

The post Smiling Boosts Mood- Even When it’s Forced first appeared on Humintell | Master the Art of Reading Body Language.

Filed Under: Emotion, Science

The Humintell Blog June 10, 2025

Pandemic Kids Struggle to Recognize Happy and Fearful Faces


A large Danish study called The effects of Covid-19 related policies on neurocognitive face processing in the first four years of life was recently published in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

The study authored by Carlijn van den Boomen, Anna C. Praat, Caroline M.M. Junge, and Chantal Kemner investigated the effects of Covid-19 related measures on two facets of face processing in children aged 5 months to 3 years:

  1. Face categorization (differentiating between faces and houses)
  2. Emotional face processing (differentiating between happy, fearful, and neutral facial expressions of emotion)

Their research showed that babies and toddlers who grew up during the pandemic struggled to differentiate between happy and fearful facial expressions of emotion.

The children studied showed a marked difficulty in processing happy facial expressions, which the researchers believe was due to the limited variety of face-to-face interactions during the pandemic.

Background

The researchers wanted to study whether social restrictions introduced during the pandemic, such as reduced in-person interactions and widespread mask-wearing, may have shaped early brain development.

Studies have shown that infants are sensitive to emotions expressed through facial expressions since their first year of birth. In fact, a study published in PLOS ONE, suggests that fetuses even practice their own facial expressions while in utero!

The team wanted to know:

  • Whether a reduced variety of facial exposure might influence how children process faces and how quickly they do so.
  • Whether children can distinguish between different facial expressions of emotion (known as emotional face processing).

The Methodology

To investigate the questions above, the researchers used electroencephalography (EEG) to measure brain activity in over 900 children aged 5 months, 10 months, and 3 years.

462 children were tested before the onset of the pandemic, while 473 others were tested between March 2020 and April 2022 when COVID-19-related isolation and mask wearing policies were in place.

By testing the children at these different time periods, this allowed researchers to compare brain responses in children who had typical social exposure to those whose early years were shaped by limited social interactions and more frequent mask use in adults.

In the first part of the study, children passively viewed a series of images that included neutral faces, faces showing the facial expression of happiness, faces showing the facial expression of fear, and houses.
EEG recordings focused on event-related potentials (ERPs), patterns of electrical activity that occur in response to specific stimuli. The researchers analyzed three well-known ERP components linked to face processing.

The Results

1. Faster Face Processing

When it came to how quickly the brain responded to faces, the researchers found no meaningful differences in 5 or 10-month-old infants between those tested before and during the pandemic.

However, in three-year-olds, there was a notable difference.

Young children tested during the pandemic showed earlier responses to faces than their pre-pandemic counterparts, indicating faster neural processing of facial information.

The finding of faster face processing was somewhat unexpected.

In typical development, the speed at which the brain processes faces increases with age and experience.

However, some previous research in adults has shown that reduced facial information — such as when faces are masked — can lead to quicker processing.

2. Face Categorization

In contrast, the ability to tell the difference between faces and non-facial objects, known as face categorization, appeared unaffected by the pandemic.

Across all age groups, children tested before and during the pandemic showed similar patterns of brain activity when viewing faces versus houses.

This suggests that this fundamental aspect of face processing is resilient and may not depend as strongly on a wide range of facial experiences.

3. Reduced Differentiation of Emotional Expressions

One of the most striking findings emerged when the researchers examined how children responded to emotional expressions.

Children tested before the pandemic showed distinct patterns of brain activity when viewing happy, fearful, and neutral faces. But among those tested during the pandemic, this differentiation was reduced or absent.

In both ten-month-olds and three-year-olds, brain responses to happy and fearful faces became less distinguishable, especially in the later ERP components, which are thought to reflect attention or familiarity.

These differences were particularly driven by a reduced neural response to happy faces.

While children in the pre-pandemic group showed stronger brain responses to happy expressions, those tested during the pandemic had weaker responses.

This pattern suggests that happy faces were either less familiar or attracted less attention in the post-pandemic group.

Explanations

  1. The researchers propose several possible explanations for their findings:
  2. The variety of happy expressions that children saw may have decreased during the pandemic, due to both mask-wearing and the emotional toll experienced by caregivers.
  3. If children saw fewer smiling faces, their brains may have become less attuned to recognizing and reacting to them.

The brain’s emotional face processing system is known to be shaped by experience, especially during early development.

Just as infants need to see a variety of faces to build a robust mental representation of them, they may also need a range of emotional expressions to learn how to distinguish them.

Consequences

This study is significant not only for parents but also for policymakers, as it demonstrates the broader societal impacts of pandemic-era policies.

Facial expressions of emotion are important cues in social and cognitive learning. As such, the limited processing of such cues can have far-reaching consequences for the further development of children.

This is important to know for policy makers, and for parents of and individuals working with children that were 0-4 years old during the pandemic.

Moreover, this insight could also benefit children born in non-pandemic times children, as they benefit from a variety of social experiences as well.

Limitations

The study does come with some limitations.

While the researchers inferred that children tested during the pandemic had reduced facial input, they did not measure the exact nature or frequency of children’s social interactions.

Researchers suggest it’s possible that some families maintained relatively typical social environments, while others experienced more extreme isolation.

Other factors, such as parental stress, mental health, and daycare attendance, may also have influenced the outcomes.

Additionally, while brain activity patterns were measured, the study did not assess behavioral responses, such as whether children could label or respond appropriately to different facial expressions.

Dr. Matsumoto’s Thoughts

The results of this study are not surprising, given the growing number of studies demonstrating the negative and somewhat deleterious effects of the use of masks on facial emotional expression recognition and identification in young children.

These negative effects are expected, given the importance of the exposure of the emotional expressions of others in human (and nonhuman) socio-emotional development.

These findings also dovetail with the many deleterious effects of the lack of play with others in childhood over the past several decades. Play with others is incredibly important for learning valuable skills, including problem solving, self- and emotional-regulation, communication, dispute resolution, and many others.

All of these skills are also vitally important in adulthood as well; and learning to read other’s facial expressions of emotion lays at the core of many of these skills.

These emotional detriments that have occurred because of the decrease in play and especially masking during the Covid pandemic may have serious effects for years to come.

Yet, we can all do something to self-correct, which would involve making greater efforts to allow our kids to interact with others, play outside, and deal with problems on their own, all of which can be facilitated by making sure our children learn to read facial expressions of emotion.

The post Pandemic Kids Struggle to Recognize Happy and Fearful Faces first appeared on Humintell | Master the Art of Reading Body Language.

Filed Under: Parenting, Science

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 276
  • Next Page »

About

Welcome to an aggregator for blogs about social engineering and related fields. Feel free to take a look around, and make sure to visit the original sites.

If you would like to suggest a site or contact us, use the links below.

Contact

  • Contact
  • Suggest a Site
  • Remove a Site

© Copyright 2025 Social Engineering Blogs · All Rights Reserved ·