Reproductive potential
Now, there are a lot of variables that can influence reproductive success but the most important of them all is ‘availability of resources’.
There is a direct relationship between the reproductive success of males and their resourcefulness.
These parents seemed to unconsciously understand that in tough economic conditions reproductive certainty became more important than higher reproductive potential.
Even more intriguing is the fact that such preferences also exist at the womb level. When resources are scarce, female biology suppresses boys’ survival in the womb. The result being that mothers give birth to fewer males than normal.
Here’s a short video discussing this…
 
 References:
Cameron, E. Z., & Dalerum, F. (2009). A Trivers-Willard effect in contemporary humans: male-biased sex ratios among billionaires. PLoS One, 4(1), e4195.
Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Redden, J. P., & White, A. E. (2015). Spending on daughters versus sons in economic recessions. Journal of Consumer Research, ucv023.
 Male elephant seals engaged in a bloody combat.In humans, intrasexual competition among the males throughout our evolutionary history has been quite similar to that seen in elephant seals.Since human females invest more heavily in the offspring, they’re a valuable limiting resource on reproduction for males. Males are constrained in their reproduction by their ability to gain sexual access to high-investing females.This sex difference in minimum obligatory parental investment means that males can produce more offspring than females can. This difference leads to a different reproductive variance of males and females. Reproductive variance simply means how varying your chances of reproduction are.While most human females reproduce sooner or later (since they invest a lot and so are in demand), men can be totally denied a chance to pass on their genes. This is what is meant by ‘high reproductive variance’ of human males.   Consequences of a high reproductive varianceHigh reproductive variance in men leads to riskier strategies for securing reproduction. The males that take more risks are more likely to be reproductively successful. Due to this, some males gain more than their ‘fair share’ of copulations, while other males are shut out entirely (like defeated male elephant seals).This leads to more ferocious competition within the high-variance sex. Polygyny, over evolutionary time, selects for risky strategies, including those that lead to violent combat with rivals and those that lead to increased risk taking to acquire the resources needed to attract members of the high-investing sex.This is why human males engage in a lot of violence with one another, even if it may have no direct bearing on their reproductive success in the given moment e.g. pre-pubescent boys wrestling with each other. This evolutionarily important behaviour has to be practised since childhood just as boxers practise a lot before the actual fight. Passing on one’s genes is an important matter biologically speaking, and therefore our psychology is evolved to ensure that we practise behaviors that contribute to our reproductive success in the future.Women, on the other hand, have nothing to gain by being violent but a lot to lose. Women need to place a higher value on their own lives than do men on theirs, given the fact that infants depend on maternal care more than on paternal care. Women’s evolved psychology, therefore, should reflect greater fearfulness of situations that pose a physical threat of bodily injury and avoidance of such situations as much as possible.Instead of violent physical aggression, women’s intrasexual competition manifests as gossiping, shunning the other person, spreading vicious rumours, breaking contact with the other person and befriending someone else.Also, as children and teens, women prefer more nurturing behaviours such as feeding and grooming their dolls or looking after other infants in the family than playing with guns and action hero figures.It’s all nothing but practice- practice of evolutionarily important things to come in the future.
Male elephant seals engaged in a bloody combat.In humans, intrasexual competition among the males throughout our evolutionary history has been quite similar to that seen in elephant seals.Since human females invest more heavily in the offspring, they’re a valuable limiting resource on reproduction for males. Males are constrained in their reproduction by their ability to gain sexual access to high-investing females.This sex difference in minimum obligatory parental investment means that males can produce more offspring than females can. This difference leads to a different reproductive variance of males and females. Reproductive variance simply means how varying your chances of reproduction are.While most human females reproduce sooner or later (since they invest a lot and so are in demand), men can be totally denied a chance to pass on their genes. This is what is meant by ‘high reproductive variance’ of human males.   Consequences of a high reproductive varianceHigh reproductive variance in men leads to riskier strategies for securing reproduction. The males that take more risks are more likely to be reproductively successful. Due to this, some males gain more than their ‘fair share’ of copulations, while other males are shut out entirely (like defeated male elephant seals).This leads to more ferocious competition within the high-variance sex. Polygyny, over evolutionary time, selects for risky strategies, including those that lead to violent combat with rivals and those that lead to increased risk taking to acquire the resources needed to attract members of the high-investing sex.This is why human males engage in a lot of violence with one another, even if it may have no direct bearing on their reproductive success in the given moment e.g. pre-pubescent boys wrestling with each other. This evolutionarily important behaviour has to be practised since childhood just as boxers practise a lot before the actual fight. Passing on one’s genes is an important matter biologically speaking, and therefore our psychology is evolved to ensure that we practise behaviors that contribute to our reproductive success in the future.Women, on the other hand, have nothing to gain by being violent but a lot to lose. Women need to place a higher value on their own lives than do men on theirs, given the fact that infants depend on maternal care more than on paternal care. Women’s evolved psychology, therefore, should reflect greater fearfulness of situations that pose a physical threat of bodily injury and avoidance of such situations as much as possible.Instead of violent physical aggression, women’s intrasexual competition manifests as gossiping, shunning the other person, spreading vicious rumours, breaking contact with the other person and befriending someone else.Also, as children and teens, women prefer more nurturing behaviours such as feeding and grooming their dolls or looking after other infants in the family than playing with guns and action hero figures.It’s all nothing but practice- practice of evolutionarily important things to come in the future. The more direct the physical aggression in a sport, the more admired the sportsperson is. For example, boxing and wrestling champions are more admired than Tennis champions.  This is the reason why men are so passionate about sports. They identify themselves with their favorite sportsmen and see them as role models. Any character, fictional or real, who’s dominant and aggressive is admired by men.  Real examples would include characters like Alexander, Ghengis Khan and Hannibal while fictional would include the “heroes” in superhero and action movies that are disproportionately viewed by more men than women.
The more direct the physical aggression in a sport, the more admired the sportsperson is. For example, boxing and wrestling champions are more admired than Tennis champions.  This is the reason why men are so passionate about sports. They identify themselves with their favorite sportsmen and see them as role models. Any character, fictional or real, who’s dominant and aggressive is admired by men.  Real examples would include characters like Alexander, Ghengis Khan and Hannibal while fictional would include the “heroes” in superhero and action movies that are disproportionately viewed by more men than women.